Conscious Representations: An Intractable Problem for the Computational Theory of Mind [Book Review]
Graduate studies at Western
Minds and Machines 21 (1):19-32 (2011)
|Abstract||Advocates of the computational theory of mind claim that the mind is a computer whose operations can be implemented by various computational systems. According to these philosophers, the mind is multiply realisable because—as they claim—thinking involves the manipulation of syntactically structured mental representations. Since syntactically structured representations can be made of different kinds of material while performing the same calculation, mental processes can also be implemented by different kinds of material. From this perspective, consciousness plays a minor role in mental activity. However, contemporary neuroscience provides experimental evidence suggesting that mental representations necessarily involve consciousness. Consciousness does not only enable individuals to become aware of their own thoughts, it also constantly changes the causal properties of these thoughts. In light of these empirical studies, mental representations appear to be intrinsically dependent on consciousness. This discovery represents an obstacle to any attempt to construct an artificial mind|
|Keywords||consciousness awarness mental representation mental causation computational theory of mind mental content Kandel Squire memory neuroscience|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Eric Dietrich & A. Markman (2003). Discrete Thoughts: Why Cognition Must Use Discrete Representations. Mind and Language 18 (1):95-119.
J. Christopher Maloney (1994). Content: Covariation, Control, and Contingency. Synthese 100 (2):241-90.
David Davenport (2012). Computationalism: Still the Only Game in Town. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 22 (3):183-190.
David Pitt, Mental Representation. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
David Rose (2006). Consciousness: Philosophical, Psychological and Neural Theories. Oxford University Press.
David M. Rosenthal (1986). Two Concepts of Consciousness. Philosophical Studies 49 (May):329-59.
Kirk Ludwig & Susan Schneider (2008). Fodor's Challenge to the Classical Computational Theory of Mind. Mind and Language 23 (1):123–143.
Matthew Stuart Piper (2012). You Can't Eat Causal Cake with an Abstract Fork: An Argument Against Computational Theories of Consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 19 (11-12):154-90.
Harald Atmanspacher (2010). Acategorial States in a Representational Theory of Mental Processes. Journal of Consciousness Studies 17 (5-6):5 - 6.
David Robb & John Heil, Mental Causation. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Lynne Rudder Baker (1991). Has Content Been Naturalized? In Barry M. Loewer & Georges Rey (eds.), Meaning in Mind: Fodor and His Critics. Blackwell.
Paul Katsafanas (2005). Nietzsche's Theory of Mind: Consciousness and Conceptualization. European Journal of Philosophy 13 (1):1–31.
Tim Crane (2000). The Origins of Qualia. In Tim Crane & Sarah A. Patterson (eds.), The History of the Mind-Body Problem. Routledge.
Added to index2010-10-03
Total downloads113 ( #6,147 of 739,697 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,338 of 739,697 )
How can I increase my downloads?