Designing a Good Life: A Matrix for the Technological Mediation of Morality [Book Review]

Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (1):157-172 (2012)
Abstract
Technologies fulfill a social role in the sense that they influence the moral actions of people, often in unintended and unforeseen ways. Scientists and engineers are already accepting much responsibility for the technological, economical and environmental aspects of their work. This article asks them to take an extra step, and now also consider the social role of their products. The aim is to enable engineers to take a prospective responsibility for the future social roles of their technologies by providing them with a matrix that helps to explore in advance how emerging technologies might plausibly affect the reasons behind people’s (moral) actions. On the horizontal axis of the matrix, we distinguished the three basic types of reasons that play a role in practical judgment: what is the case, what can be done and what should be done. On the vertical axis we distinguished the morally relevant classes of issues: stakeholders, consequences and the good life. To illustrate how this matrix may work in practice, the final section applies the matrix to the case of the Google PowerMeter
Keywords Responsibility  Mediation  Technology  NEST ethics  Techno-moral change
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,346
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
C. Mitcham (1997). Engineering Design Research and Social Responsibility. In Kristin Shrader-Frechette & Laura Westra (eds.), Technology and Values. Rowman & Littlefield. 261--278.

View all 8 references

Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Richard Arneson (1999). Human Flourishing Versus Desire Satisfaction. Social Philosophy and Policy 16 (01):113-142.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-12-04

Total downloads

23 ( #72,166 of 1,096,701 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #271,187 of 1,096,701 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.