Grue

Analysis 28 (4):123 - 128 (1968)
Abstract CONTRARY TO GOODMAN’S VIEW, A CLEAR DISTINCTION CAN BE MADE BETWEEN QUALITATIVE AND POSITIONAL PREDICATES. HENCE WE CAN EXPLAIN THAT WE OUGHT TO PROJECT ’GREEN’ RATHER THAN ’GRUE’ BECAUSE THE LATTER IS A POSITIONAL PREDICATE, RATHER THAN BECAUSE THE LATTER IS LESS WELL ENTRENCHED. A PREDICATE IS POSITIONAL IF, TO FIND OUT AS CERTAINLY AS WE CAN WHETHER IT APPLIES TO AN OBJECT, WE HAVE TO FIND OUT THE LATTER’S SPATIO-TEMPORAL LOCATION.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 5,672
External links
  • Through your library Configure

    Similar books and articles
    Gary Sollazzo (1972). Barker and Achinstein on Goodman. Philosophical Studies 23 (1-2):91 - 97.
    C. A. Hooker (1968). Goodman, 'Grue' and Hempel. Philosophy of Science 35 (3):232-247.
    David H. Sanford (1070). Disjunctive Predicates. American Philosophical Quarterly 30 (2):167-1722.
    John Moreland (1976). On Projecting Grue. Philosophy of Science 43 (3):363-377.
    F. M. Akeroyd (1991). A Practical Example of Grue. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (4):535-539.
    J. S. Ullian (1961). More on "Grue" and Grue. Philosophical Review 70 (3):386-389.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2011-04-12

    Total downloads

    19 ( #64,338 of 549,051 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #63,185 of 549,051 )

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums