David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Paradigmi 1:49-65 (2011)
One of the fundamental questions of life sciences is one of whether there are genuinely random biological processes. An affirmative or negative answer to this question may have important methodological consequences. It appears that a number of biological processes are explicitly classified as random. One of them is the so-called somatic hypermutation. However, closer analysis of somatic hypermutation reveals that it is not a genuinely random process. Somatic hypermutation is called random because the exact outcome of this process is difficult to predict in practice. The case of somatic hypermutation suggests that there may be no scientific evidence of a single case of ontologically random process in the biological world.
|Keywords||Determinism Indeterminism Philosophy of immunology Randomness Somatic hypermutation Reproducibility|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ann Pirruccello (2002). Making the World My Body: Simone Weil and Somatic Practice. Philosophy East and West 52 (4):479-497.
Deng K. Niu & Jia-Kuan Chen (1998). Ideas in Theoretical Biology Origin of Cancerous Cells From Tumours. Acta Biotheoretica 46 (4):379-381.
Stefan Linquist & Jordan Bartol (2013). Two Myths About Somatic Markers. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (3):455-484.
Giovanna Colombetti (2008). The Somatic Marker Hypotheses, and What the Iowa Gambling Task Does and Does Not Show. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (1):51-71.
Roberta L. Millstein (2003). How Not to Argue for the Indeterminism of Evolution: A Look at Two Recent Attempts to Settle the Issue. In Andreas Hüttemann (ed.), Determinism in Physics and Biology. Mentis
I. Walker (1996). Prediction of Evolution? Somatic Plasticity as a Basic, Physiological Condition for the Viability of Genetic Mutations. Acta Biotheoretica 44 (2):165-168.
Bartlomiej Swiatczak (2012). Immune System, Immune Self. Introduction. Avant: Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies 3 (1):12-18.
Luann D. Fortune (2011). Essences of Somatic Awareness as Captured in a Verbally Directed Body Scan. Schutzian Research 3:107-119.
Antony Eagle (2010). Chance Versus Randomness. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Joseph Berkovitz, Roman Frigg & Fred Kronz (2006). The Ergodic Hierarchy, Randomness and Hamiltonian Chaos☆. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 37 (4):661-691.
Roman Frigg (2006). The Ergodic Hierarchy, Randomness and Hamiltonian Chaos. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 37 (4):661-691.
Vincent Michael Colapietro (2002). Love and Death--And Other Somatic Transactions. Hypatia 17 (4):163-172.
Joseph Berkovitz, Roman Frigg & Fred Kronz (2006). The Ergodic Hierarchy, Randomness and Hamiltonian Chaos. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 37 (4):661-691.
Timothy Caulfield & Tania Bubela (2007). Why a Criminal Ban? Analyzing the Arguments Against Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer in the Canadian Parliamentary Debate. American Journal of Bioethics 7 (2):51 – 61.
Added to index2011-04-29
Total downloads33 ( #131,005 of 2,117,590 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #219,397 of 2,117,590 )
How can I increase my downloads?