Reply to Richard Gale
Religious Studies 36 (2):221-225 (2000)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRichard M. Gale (1991). On the Nature and Existence of God. Cambridge University Press.
Dean Zimmerman (2003). Richard Gale and the Free Will Defense. Philo 6 (1):78-113.
Russell B. Goodman (2000). Review: Richard M. Gale the Divided Self of William James. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999). Pp. 364. $59.95. [REVIEW] Religious Studies 36 (2):227-245.
Richard M. Gale (1963). A Reply to Smart, Mayo and Thalberg on "Tensed Statements". Philosophical Quarterly 13 (53):351-356.
Theodore M. Drange (2003). Gale on Omnipotence. Philo 6 (1):23-26.
Richard M. Gale (1964). A Reply on the Alleged Futurity of Yesterday. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 24 (3):421-422.
Richard Gale (1993). A Reply to Paul Helm. Religious Studies 29 (2):257 - 263.
Richard M. Gale (1977). A Reply to Oaklander. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 38 (2):234-238.
John Post (2004). Reply to Gale and Pruss. Philo: A Journal of Philosophy 7 (1):114-121.
John F. Post (2004). Reply to Gale and Pruss. Philo 7 (1):114-121.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads14 ( #83,078 of 549,065 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,065 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
