Theodicy, Our Well-Being, and God's Rights

Theodicy needs to show, for all actual evils e, that 1) in allowing e, a God would bring about a necessary condition of a good g not achievable in any other morally permissible way, 2) if e occurs, g occurs, 3) it is morally permissible for God to allow e, and 4) g is at least as good as e is bad. This article contributes to a full-scale theodicy by showing that A being of use (e.g., by suffering) to B is a great good for A, and that in consequence, if 1) and 2) are satisfied, 3) and 4) are also likely to be satisfied
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF01322949
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 19,950
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Robert Mark Simpson (2009). Moral Antitheodicy: Prospects and Problems. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 65 (3):153 - 169.
Michael Levine (2012). The Positive Function of Evil? Philosophical Papers 41 (1):149-165.
Robert Mark Simpson (2009). Moral Antitheodicy: Prospects and Problems. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 65 (3):153-169.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

116 ( #31,731 of 1,792,066 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #207,127 of 1,792,066 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.