David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (3):584–611 (2003)
I argue against the standard view that ontological debates can be fully described as disagreements about what we should believe to exist. The central thesis of the paper is that believing in Fs in the ontologically relevant sense requires more than merely believing that Fs exist. Believing in Fs is not even a propositional attitude; it is rather an attitude one bears to the term expressed by 'Fs'. The representational correctness of such a belief requires not only that there be Fs, but also that the term expressed by 'Fs' should not misrepresent them. In certain cases we might believe that there are Fs without believing our conception of Fs applies to them. This may well be the situation we are in with regard to abstract entities of various sorts
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Paul Horwich (2005). Truth. In Frank Jackson & Michael Smith (eds.), Erkenntnis. Oxford University Press 261-272.
David Hume (1739/2000). A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford University Press.
Paul Horwich (1998). Truth. Clarendon Press.
Peter van Inwagen (1990). Material Beings. Cornell University Press.
Penelope Maddy (1990). Realism in Mathematics. Oxford University Prress.
Citations of this work BETA
Uriah Kriegel (2015). Experiencing the Present. Analysis 75 (3):407-413.
Agustín Rayo (2007). Ontological Commitment. Philosophy Compass 2 (3):428–444.
Friederike Moltmann (2013). The Semantics of Existence. Linguistics and Philosophy 36 (1):31-63.
Alex Grzankowski (2012). Not All Attitudes Are Propositional. European Journal of Philosophy (3):374-391.
Michelle Montague (2007). Against Propositionalism. Noûs 41 (3):503–518.
Similar books and articles
Mark Schroeder (forthcoming). Tempered Expressivism. Oxford Studies in Metaethics.
Russell B. Goodman (1974). Is Seeing Believing? Proceedings of the New Mexico-West Texas Philosophical Society 40 (April):45.
Christian Piller (2009). Valuing Knowledge: A Deontological Approach. [REVIEW] Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (4):413 - 428.
Damian Cox & Michael Levine (2004). Believing Badly. Philosophical Papers 33 (3):309-328.
Jonathan L. Kvanvig & Christopher Menzel (1990). The Basic Notion of Justification. Philosophical Studies 59 (3):235-261.
Dorit Ganson (2008). Evidentialism and Pragmatic Constraints on Outright Belief. Philosophical Studies 139 (3):441 - 458.
John N. Williams (2009). Justifying Circumstances and Moore-Paradoxical Beliefs: A Response to Brueckner. Analysis 69 (3):490-496.
Jonathan Sutton, How to Mistake a Trivial Fact About Probability for a Substantive Fact About Justified Belief.
Mark Mercer (2010). In Defence of Believing Wishfully. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (2):211-224.
Robert Audi (2008). Belief, Faith, and Acceptance. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 63 (1/3):87 - 102.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads108 ( #36,125 of 1,906,925 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #92,032 of 1,906,925 )
How can I increase my downloads?