David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In natural sciences, the most interesting and relevant questions are the so-called why-questions. There are several different approaches to why-questions and explanations in the literature, however, most of the literature deals with why-questions about particular events, such as ``Why did Adam eat the apple?''. Even the best known theory of explanation, Hempel's covering law model, is designed for explaining particular events. Here we only deal with purely theoretical why-questions about general phenomena of physics, for instance ``Why can no observer move faster than light?'' or ``Why are Kepler's laws valid?''. Here we are not going to develop a whole new theory of why-questions in physics. We will just touch upon some ideas and examples relevant to our subject.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Michèle Friend & Daniele Molinini (2016). Using Mathematics to Explain a Scientific Theory. Philosophia Mathematica 24 (2):185-213.
Gergely Székely (2010). A Geometrical Characterization of the Twin Paradox and its Variants. Studia Logica 95 (1/2):161 - 182.
Similar books and articles
Charles B. Cross (1991). Explanation and the Theory of Questions. Erkenntnis 34 (2):237 - 260.
Robert A. Wilson (2004). Review of Kitcher. [REVIEW] Human Nature Reviews.
Antti Koura (1988). An Approach to Why-Questions. Synthese 74 (2):191 - 206.
Michael Tye (2009). Interview for Mind and Consciousness: 5 Questions. In Patrick Grim (ed.), Mind and Consciousness: 5 Questions. Automatic Press
Nick Huggett (2010). Everywhere and Everywhen: Adventures in Physics and Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
William Jaworski (2009). The Logic of How-Questions. Synthese 166 (1):133 - 155.
Andrzej Wiśniewski (1996). The Logic of Questions as a Theory of Erotetic Arguments. Synthese 109 (1):1 - 25.
Added to index2009-05-05
Total downloads33 ( #120,304 of 1,796,454 )
Recent downloads (6 months)13 ( #55,101 of 1,796,454 )
How can I increase my downloads?