David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Economic Methodology 12 (1):35-61 (2005)
Following James Rule and Colin Clark, a single?theory?driven approach to scientific inquiry which focuses on testing particular theories can be distinguished from an explanation?driven approach which is open to all observations and whose results do not cease to have value with the passing of a particular theory. Several ?decision points? in the historiography of the Great Depression are examined and it is shown that the decisions made at each point reflect a single?theory?driven orientation. It is argued that the single?theory?driven approach likely characterizes other fields of Economics, and also that this paper's method of applying a ?test? to various decision points in the evolution of economic thought is of widespread utility. The likely cost of a single?theory?driven bias in terms of our collective understanding is discussed.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
John-Michael M. Kuczynski (2006). Formal Operations and Simulated Thought. Philosophical Explorations 9 (2):221-234.
C. Kenneth Waters (2007). The Nature and Context of Exploratory Experimentation: An Introduction to Three Case Studies of Exploratory Research. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 29 (3):275 - 284.
Paul Humphreys (2004). Some Thoughts on Wesley Salmon's Contributions to the Philosophy of Probability. Philosophy of Science 71 (5):942-949.
Juha Saatsi (2009). Form Vs. Content-Driven Arguments for Realism. In P. D. Magnus & Jacob Busch (eds.), New Waves in Philosophy of Science. Palgrave Macmillan.
Susan L. Hurley (2000). Is Responsibility Essentially Impossible? Philosophical Studies 99 (2):229-268.
John D. Norton (1992). A Paradox in Newtonian Gravitation Theory. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:412 - 420.
Surendra Arjoon (2000). Virtue Theory as a Dynamic Theory of Business. Journal of Business Ethics 28 (2):159 - 178.
M. Albert (2007). The Propensity Theory: A Decision-Theoretic Restatement. Synthese 156 (3):587 - 603.
R. Bruce Paton (2007). Evaluating the Social Impact of Bottom of the Pyramid Businesses. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:463-466.
A. Baker (2012). Science-Driven Mathematical Explanation. Mind 121 (482):243-267.
Colin Howson (1988). On a Recent Argument for the Impossibility of a Statistical Explanation of Single Events, and a Defence of a Modified Form of Hempel's Theory of Statistical Explanation. Erkenntnis 29 (1):113 - 124.
John W. Sutherland (2000). Extending the Reach of Collective Decision Support Systems: Provisions for Disciplining Judgment-Driven Exercises. Theory and Decision 48 (1):1-46.
Didier Dubois, Petr Hájek & Henri Prade (2000). Knowledge-Driven Versus Data-Driven Logics. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 9 (1):65--89.
Anastasia Nesvetailova (2005). United in Debt: Towards a Global Crisis of Debt-Driven Finance? Science and Society 69 (3):396 - 419.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-02-20
Total downloads2 ( #350,776 of 1,101,768 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #178,613 of 1,101,768 )
How can I increase my downloads?