David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethics and the Environment 11 (1):97-132 (2006)
: The treatment of animals and the Holocaust have been compared many times before, but never has a thoroughly detailed comparison been offered. A thirty-nine-point comparison can be constructed, whether or not one believes that animals are oppressed. The question of whether or not the comparison ought to be expressed merely brings into question whether animal liberationists have liberal-democratic rights to express themselves, which they surely do. Four objections are considered: Is the comparison offensive? Does the comparison trivialize what happened to the victims of the Nazis, overlook important differences, or ignore supposed affinities between animal liberationists and Nazis? These four lines of attack are shown to fail. The comparison stands to help us to reflect on the significance of how animals are treated in contemporary times
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Tom Regan (2009). The Case for Animal Rights. In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Noûs. Oxford University Press 425-434.
S. F. Sapontzis (1987). Morals, Reason, and Animals. Temple University Press.
Bernard E. Rollin (1981). Animal Rights and Human Morality. Prometheus Books.
R. G. Frey (1980). Interests and Rights: The Case Against Animals. Oxford University Press.
Peter Carruthers (1992). The Animals Issue: Moral Theory in Practice. Cambridge University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Mickey Gjerris (2015). Willed Blindness: A Discussion of Our Moral Shortcomings in Relation to Animals. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28 (3):517-532.
Will Kymlicka & Sue Donaldson (2014). Animal Rights, Multiculturalism, and the Left. Journal of Social Philosophy 45 (1):116-135.
Evan G. Williams (2015). The Possibility of an Ongoing Moral Catastrophe. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (5):971-982.
Maneesha Deckha (2008). Disturbing Images: Peta and the Feminist Ethics of Animal Advocacy. Ethics and the Environment 13 (2):pp. 35-76.
Similar books and articles
Donna Yarri (2005). The Ethics of Animal Experimentation: A Critical Analysis and Constructive Christian Proposal. OUP Usa.
Timothy M. Costelloe (2003). The Invisibility of Evil: Moral Progress and the 'Animal Holocaust'. Philosophical Papers 32 (2):109-131.
Charles Patterson (2002). Eternal Treblinka: Our Treatment of Animals and the Holocaust. Lantern Books.
Hon-Lam Li (2002). Animal Research, Non-Vegetarianism, and the Moral Status of Animals - Understanding the Impasse of the Animal Rights Problem. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (5):589 – 615.
Mark H. Bernstein (2004). Without a Tear: Our Tragic Relationship with Animals. University of Illinois Press.
Beth A. Dixon (1996). The Feminist Connection Between Women and Animals. Environmental Ethics 18 (2):181-194.
Bernard E. Rollin (1989). Ethical Obligations of Veterinarians and Animal Scientists in Animal Agriculture. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 2 (3):225-234.
Hugh LaFollette & Niall Shanks (1996). The Origin of Speciesism. Philosophy 71 (275):41-.
Holly L. Wilson (2011). Kant's Treatment of Animals. In Paul Pojman (ed.), Food Ethics. Wadsworth
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads73 ( #60,521 of 1,911,732 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #180,473 of 1,911,732 )
How can I increase my downloads?