David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 13 (3-4):181-203 (2000)
Humanism – in the sense that humans alonehave moral standing, or else a surpassing degree of it– has traditionally dominated all of ethicaldiscourse. However, its past formulations havesuccumbed to the temptation merely to stipulate sucha criterion, such as rationality, which nonhumans areoften deemed (without sufficient argument) to failwithout exception. Animal liberationistarguments do exist in counterpoint to traditionalhumanism, but one current difficulty seems to be asimple clash of basic assumptions, with an indecisiveresult. Although the author of this paper is anonanthropocentrist, he attempts to further the moraltheoretical debate by constructing a more powerfulversion of humanism, based in a pursuit of the good,per se. The theory is premised upon viewing humans asgenerally having and leading lives of greater value,in some relevant sense. This essay prefigures theauthor's refutation of humanism, more generally, inthe understanding that such a world view cannot trulybe refuted unless its best version is answered.Whatever the status of this paper's offering of``Obligatory'' Anthropocentrism, the theory can be seento have a great deal more success than itspredecessors in parrying, and apparently outdoing,contemporary animal liberationist philosophies.
|Keywords||animal rights anthropocentrism empathy environmental ethics ethics humanism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Evelyn B. Pluhar (2006). Experimentation on Humans and Nonhumans. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (4):333-355.
Kamel Mellahi & Geoffrey Wood (2005). Business Failure in the Use of Animals: Ethical Issues and Contestations. Business Ethics 14 (2):151–163.
Similar books and articles
Stephen Law (2011). Humanism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
John Grumley (2008). New Adventures in the Dialectic of Humanism: Todorov, Sebald and Agamben. Critical Horizons 9 (2):189-213.
Tony Davies (2008). Humanism. Routledge.
David Sztybel (2000). Response to Evelyn B. Pluhar's ``Non-Obligatory Anthropocentrism''. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 13 (3-4):337-340.
David W. Ehrenfeld (1978). The Arrogance of Humanism. Oxford University Press.
John Carroll (1993). Humanism: The Wreck of Western Culture. Fontana Press.
Matthew Calarco (2005). “Another Insistence of Man”: Prolegomena to the Question of the Animal in Derrida's Reading of Heidegger. Human Studies 28 (3):317 - 334.
Jim Herrick (2003/2005). Humanism: An Introduction. Prometheus Books.
Evelyn B. Pluhar (2000). Non-Obligatory Anthropocentrism. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 13 (3-4):329-335.
Erika Rummel (2000). The Confessionalization of Humanism in Reformation Germany. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads154 ( #14,379 of 1,727,171 )
Recent downloads (6 months)128 ( #5,745 of 1,727,171 )
How can I increase my downloads?