David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Philosophical Quarterly 49 (2):185-206 (2009)
Immanuel Kant’s position on international justice is beset by some troublesome inconsistencies, most notably a conflicted set of views on the status of federations as suitable alternatives to a world state. It is tempting for contemporary readers to interpret Kant’s indecision as a lack of commitment or resoluteness. Closer inspection demonstrates that this problem involves deeper paradoxes, rooted in the concept of sovereignty. On this matter, Kant’s Rechtslehre is the source of the difficulties found in the “popular” essays. Kant’s vacillating position on the proper institutional end for international relations is attributable to the fundamentally “permissive” character of his concept of right. Rechtslehre doctrines entail a form of skepticism, from which a coherent cosmopolitan program cannot possibly be derived
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Antonio Franceschet (2010). Kant, International Law, and the Problem of Humanitarian Intervention. Journal of International Political Theory 6 (1):1-22.
Similar books and articles
Pauline Kleingeld (1998). Kant's Cosmopolitan Law: World Citizenship for a Global Order. Kantian Review 2 (1):72-90.
Burleigh T. Wilkins (2007). Kant on International Relations. Journal of Ethics 11 (2):147 - 159.
Kjartan Mikalsen (2011). In Defense of Kant's League of States. Law and Philosophy 30 (3):291-317.
Pauline Kleingeld (2012). Kant and Cosmopolitanism: The Philosophical Ideal of World Citizenship. Cambridge University Press.
Hedley Bull (2012). The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. Columbia University Press.
Pauline Kleingeld (2004). Approaching Perpetual Peace: Kant’s Defence of a League of States and His Ideal of a World Federation. European Journal of Philosophy 12 (3):304-325.
Sharon Anderson-Gold (2007). Cosmopolitan Community and the Law of World Citizenship. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 3:45-50.
Lara Denis (2010). Review: McCarty, Kant's Theory of Action. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (4):533-535.
Sharon Anderson-Gold (2012). Philosophers of Peace: Hobbes and Kant on International Order. Hobbes Studies 25 (1):6-20.
Karoly Kokai (2007). Das Kreisen um die Gerechtigkeit. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1:47-52.
Rosemary Foot, John Lewis Gaddis & Andrew Hurrell (eds.) (2003). Order and Justice in International Relations. Oxford University Press.
Simon Shengjian Xie (2009). What is Kant: A Compatibilist or an Incompatibilist? A New Interpretation of Kant's Solution to the Free Will Problem. Kant-Studien 100 (1):53-76.
R. Sebastian (2007). Comments on Guyer. Inquiry 50 (5):489 – 496.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads4 ( #383,052 of 1,699,714 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #269,935 of 1,699,714 )
How can I increase my downloads?