Making sense of the nature–nurture debate
Biology and Philosophy 24 (5):711-723 (2009)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesKarola Stotz (2008). The Ingredients for a Postgenomic Synthesis of Nature and Nurture. Philosophical Psychology 21 (3):359 – 381.
Laura Purdy (1986). Nature and Nurture: A False Dichotomy? Hypatia 1 (1):167 - 174.
Evan Thompson & Mog Stapleton (2009). Making Sense of Sense-Making: Reflections on Enactive and Extended Mind Theories. Topoi 28 (1):23-30.
Edward M. Hundert (1995). Lessons From an Optical Illusion: On Nature and Nurture, Knowledge and Values. Harvard University Press.
Nancy Tuana (1986). A Reply to Laura Purdy. Hypatia 1 (1):175 - 178.
Harry Cowen (1994). The Human Nature Debate: Social Theory, Social Policy, and the Caring Professions. Pluto Press.
Matthew H. Kramer (1992). God, Greed, and Flesh: Saint Paul, Thomas Hobbes, and the Nature/Nurture Debate. Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 (4):51-66.
Neven Sesardic (2010). Nature, Nurture, and Politics. Biology and Philosophy 25 (3):433-436.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-02-07Total downloads25 ( #49,656 of 549,224 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,224 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
