R. A. Fisher, Lancelot Hogben, and the Origin(s) of Genotype-Environment Interaction

Journal of the History of Biology 41 (4):717 - 761 (2008)
This essay examines the origin(s) of genotype-environment interaction, or G×E. "Origin(s)" and not "the origin" because the thesis is that there were actually two distinct concepts of G×E at this beginning: a biometric concept, or \[G \times E_B\] , and a developmental concept, or \[G \times E_D \] . R. A. Fisher, one of the founders of population genetics and the creator of the statistical analysis of variance, introduced the biometric concept as he attempted to resolve one of the main problems in the biometric tradition of biology - partitioning the relative contributions of nature and nurture responsible for variation in a population. Lancelot Hogben, an experimental embryologist and also a statistician, introduced the developmental concept as he attempted to resolve one of the main problems in the developmental tradition of biology - determining the role that developmental relationships between genotype and environment played in the generation of variation. To argue for this thesis, I outline Fisher and Hogben's separate routes to their respective concepts of G × E; then these separate interpretations of G × E are drawn on to explicate a debate between Fisher and Hogben over the importance of G × E, the first installment of a persistent controversy. Finally, Fisher's \[G \times E_B\] and Hogben's \[G \times E_D \] are traced beyond their own work into mid-2Oth century population and developmental genetics, and then into the infamous IQ Controversy of the 1970s.
Keywords analysis of variance (ANOVA)  biometry  developmental biology  eugenics  genetics  genotype–environment interaction (G × E)  IQ controversy  Lancelot Hogben  nature–nurture debate  population genetics  R. A. Fisher
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/40271518
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,667
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Sahotra Sarkar (1998). Genetics and Reductionism. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
James Tabery (2009). Interactive Predispositions. Philosophy of Science 76 (5):876-888.
C. Kenneth Waters (2011). Okasha's Unintended Argument for Toolbox Theorizing. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 82 (1):232-240.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

30 ( #105,336 of 1,726,249 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

10 ( #66,646 of 1,726,249 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.