David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Theoria 54 (113):97-111 (2007)
In this paper I criticize political realism in International Relations for not being realistic enough, for being unrealistically pessimistic and ultimately incoherent. For them the international arena will always be a place where a battle of wills, informed by the logic of power, is fought. I grant that it may be true that the international political domain is a place where such battles are fought, but this alleged infelicitous situation does not in and of itself entail the normative pessimism informing their assessments of the international domain, and it does not entail the recommendations offered by political realists, particularly relating to balance of power concerns. Their lack of realism stems from total or partial blindness to the proper and coherent ideals that ought to be informing their analyses of the international domain. Such blindness does not allow them properly to grasp what actually is the case. As we can only properly understand what an eye is by knowing the ideal that defines eyes — proper vision — so too we can only properly identify the movements of the international political arena in relation to ideals that ultimately define this arena, ideals that stem from a proper understanding of the human person. Following an Aristotelian teleological technique of analysis, I show that ideals are a constitutive part of the international domain and I recommend an alternative to political realism, namely, realistic idealism (or, if you prefer, idealistic realism).
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Klein Bluemink & Gerardus Johannes (2000). Kissingerian Realism in International Politics: Political Theory, Philosophy, and Practice. S.N..
Kimberly Hutchings (1999). International Political Theory: Rethinking Ethics in a Global Era. Sage Publications.
Andrew Hurrell (2007). On Global Order: Power, Values, and the Constitution of International Society. Oxford University Press.
Hartmut Behr (2010). A History of International Political Theory: Ontologies of the International. Palgrave Macmillan.
Beate Jahn (ed.) (2006). Classical Theory in International Relations. Cambridge University Press.
David Runciman (2012). What Is Realistic Political Philosophy? Metaphilosophy 43 (1-2):58-70.
Robert H. Jackson (2007). Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches. Oxford University Press.
Robert H. Jackson (1999). Introduction to International Relations. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads31 ( #132,842 of 1,911,757 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #70,397 of 1,911,757 )
How can I increase my downloads?