David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
OUP Oxford (2007)
This book considers the proper nature and scope of criminal responsibility in the light of its institutional and political role. Tadros begins by providing an account of the foundations, both ethical and political, of criminal responsibility, and moves on to reconsider some of the central doctrines of criminal responsibility. Part 1 examines the nature of criminal responsibility by employing a distinctive new conception of autonomy. Tadros explores the nature of autonomy, and asks what it means to respect autonomy. Building upon this consideration of autonomy, Tadros then explores the central conditions of responsibility. He provides the first systematic consideration of the relationship between criminal responsibility and liberal political theory, showing how the conditions of responsibility are articulated in, and restrained by, the institutional setting of the criminal law. In Part 2, Tadros moves on to consider some of the central doctrines of criminal responsibility. He examines the proper nature and role of causation, intentions, and beliefs; asking whether these concepts should be understood as descriptive or normative. The book moves on to provide a systematic normative investigation of the nature and role of criminal omissions and criminal defences. Included are: a thorough account of the different ways in which mental disorders might ground defences, the nature of justification defences, the different kinds of excuse claim and the role that particular characteristics of the accused might have on the standards which the defendant must have met to escape criminal responsibility.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Nicole A. Vincent (2010). On the Relevance of Neuroscience to Criminal Responsibility. Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (1):77-98.
Antony Duff (2009). Legal and Moral Responsibility. Philosophy Compass 4 (6):978-986.
Nicholas John Munn (2012). Reconciling the Criminal and Participatory Responsibilities of the Youth. Social Theory and Practice 38 (1):139-159.
Michael Plaxton (2007). Victor Tadros, Criminal Responsibility. Criminal Law and Philosophy 1 (2):223-226.
Victor Tadros (2007). Distinguishing General Theory, Doctrine and Evidence in Criminal Responsibility: A Response to Lacey. Criminal Law and Philosophy 1 (3):259-265.
Antony Duff & Stuart P. Green (eds.) (2011). Philosophical Foundations of Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.
John Gardner (2007). Offences and Defences: Selected Essays in the Philosophy of Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.
Nicola Lacey (2007). Space, Time and Function: Intersecting Principles of Responsibility Across the Terrain of Criminal Justice. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 1 (3):233-250.
Michael J. Gorr & Sterling Harwood (eds.) (1992). Controversies in Criminal Law: Philosophical Essays on Responsibility and Procedure. Westview Press.
Victor Tadros (2009). Poverty and Criminal Responsibility. Journal of Value Inquiry 43 (3):391-413.
J. H. Bogart (1987). Legislative Duty and the Independence of Law. Law and Philosophy 6 (2):187 - 203.
R. A. Duff (2010). Towards a Theory of Criminal Law? Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 84 (1):1-28.
Craig L. Carr (1991). Duress and Criminal Responsibility. Law and Philosophy 10 (2):161 - 188.
Hamish Stewart (forthcoming). Criminal Punishment as Private Morality: Victor Tadros's The Ends of Harm. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy:1-15.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-01-31
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?