Graduate studies at Western
Metaphysica 9 (2):57-68 (2008)
|Abstract||In this paper I will offer a novel understanding of a priori knowledge. My claim is that the sharp distinction that is usually made between a priori and a posteriori knowledge is groundless. It will be argued that a plausible understanding of a priori and a posteriori knowledge has to acknowledge that they are in a constant bootstrapping relationship. It is also crucial that we distinguish between a priori propositions that hold in the actual world and merely possible, non-actual a priori propositions, as we will see when considering cases like Euclidean geometry. Furthermore, contrary to what Kripke seems to suggest, a priori knowledge is intimately connected with metaphysical modality, indeed, grounded in it. The task of a priori reasoning, according to this account, is to delimit the space of metaphysically possible worlds in order for us to be able to determine what is actual.|
|Keywords||a priori a posteriori knowledge necessity possibility modality essences metaphysical possibility|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Cian Dorr (2012). De Re A Priori Knowledge. Mind 120 (480):939-991.
Jason S. Baehr, A Priori and a Posteriori. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Tuomas E. Tahko (2009). On the Modal Content of A Posteriori Necessities. Theoria 75 (4):344-357.
Nicholas F. Stang (2011). Did Kant Conflate the Necessary and the A Priori? Noûs 45 (3):443-471.
M. J. Garcia-Encinas (2012). On Categories and A Posteriori Necessity: A Phenomenological Echo. Metaphilosophy 43 (1-2):147-164.
John Turri (2011). Contingent A Priori Knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83 (2):327-344.
Tuomas E. Tahko (2011). A Priori and A Posteriori: A Bootstrapping Relationship. [REVIEW] Metaphysica 12 (2):151-164.
Added to index2009-02-01
Total downloads178 ( #2,296 of 740,441 )
Recent downloads (6 months)26 ( #4,767 of 740,441 )
How can I increase my downloads?