David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In Edward Feser (ed.), Aristotle on Method and Metaphysics. Palgrave Macmillan (2013)
Aristotle talks about 'the first philosophy' throughout the Metaphysics – and it is metaphysics that Aristotle considers to be the first philosophy – but he never makes it entirely clear what first philosophy consists of. What he does make clear is that the first philosophy is not to be understood as a collection of topics that should be studied in advance of any other topics. In fact, Aristotle seems to have thought that the topics of Metaphysics are to be studied after those in Physics. In what sense could metaphysics be the first philosophy in the context of contemporary metaphysics? This is the question examined in this essay. Contemporary topics such as fundamentality, grounding, and ontological dependence are considered as possible ways to understand the idea of first philosophy, but I will argue that the best way to understand it is in terms of essence.
|Keywords||Aristotle essence fundamentality grounding ontological dependence methodology existence|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Tuomas E. Tahko (2008). The Aristotelian Method and Aristotelian Metaphysics. In Patricia Hanna (ed.), An Anthology of Philosophical Studies. ATINER.
Kathrin Koslicki (2012). Essence, Necessity, and Explanation. In Tuomas E. Tahko (ed.), Contemporary Aristotelian Metaphysics. Cambridge University Press. 187--206.
Phil Corkum (2013). Substance and Independence in Aristotle. In B. Schnieder, A. Steinberg & M. Hoeltje (eds.), Varieties of Dependence: Ontological Dependence, Supervenience, and Response-Dependence. Basic Philosophical Concepts Series, Philosophia Verlag. 36-67.
Tuomas E. Tahko (ed.) (2012). Contemporary Aristotelian Metaphysics. Cambridge University Press.
Tuomas E. Tahko (2012). In Defence of Aristotelian Metaphysics. In , Contemporary Aristotelian Metaphysics. Cambridge University Press. 26-43.
S. Marc Cohen, Aristotle's Metaphysics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
David Charles (2002). Aristotle on Meaning and Essence. Oxford University Press.
Jessica M. Wilson (2014). No Work for a Theory of Grounding. Inquiry 57 (5-6):535–579.
Aristotle (1994). Aristotle Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.
Phil Corkum (forthcoming). Ontological Dependence and Grounding in Aristotle. Oxford Handbooks Online in Philosophy.
Ahmad Ahmadi (2007). The Fundamentality of Existence or Quiddity: A Confusion Between Epistemology and Ontology. Topoi 26 (2):213-219.
Charlotte Witt (1989). Substance and Essence in Aristotle: An Interpretation of Metaphysics Vii-Ix. Cornell University Press.
Richard Patterson (1995). Aristotle's Modal Logic: Essence and Entailment in the Organon. Cambridge University Press.
Fabrice Correia (2008). Ontological Dependence. Philosophy Compass 3 (5):1013-1032.
S. Marc Cohen (1978). Individual and Essence in Aristotle's Metaphysics. Paideia (Special Aristotle Edition):75-85.
Added to index2012-08-13
Total downloads237 ( #2,597 of 1,410,276 )
Recent downloads (6 months)25 ( #8,444 of 1,410,276 )
How can I increase my downloads?