David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Australasian Journal of Logic 7:32-47 (2009)
The goals of this paper are two-fold: I wish to clarify the Aristotelian conception of the law of non-contradiction as a metaphysical rather than a semantic or logical principle, and to defend the truth of the principle in this sense. First I will explain what it in fact means that the law of non-contradiction is a metaphysical principle. The core idea is that the law of non-contradiction is a general principle derived from how things are in the world. For example, there are certain constraints as to what kind of properties an object can have, and especially: some of these properties are mutually exclusive. Given this characterisation, I will advance to examine what kind of challenges the law of non-contradiction faces; the main opponent here is Graham Priest. I will consider these challenges and conclude that they do not threaten the truth of the law of non-contradiction understood as a metaphysical principle.
|Keywords||law of non-contradiction aristotle priest vagueness dialetheism metaphysical change zeno paraconsistent contradiction|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Tuomas E. Tahko (2014). The Metaphysical Interpretation of Logical Truth. In Penelope Rush (ed.), The Metaphysics of Logic: Logical Realism, Logical Anti-Realism and All Things In Between. Cambridge University Press 233-248.
Tuomas E. Tahko (2011). A Priori and A Posteriori: A Bootstrapping Relationship. Metaphysica 12 (2):151-164.
Douglas Kutach (2013). Causation and Its Basis in Fundamental Physics. Oxford University Press.
Luis Estrada-González (2014). On the Possibility of Realist Dialetheism. SATS 15 (2):197-217.
Enrico Berti (2014). Objections to Aristotle’s Defence of the Principle of Non-Contradiction. In Elena Ficara (ed.), Contradictions: Logic, History, Actuality. De Gruyter 97-108.
Similar books and articles
Graham Priest (2006). Doubt Truth to Be a Liar. Oxford University Press.
R. M. Dancy (1975). Sense and Contradiction: A Study in Aristotle. D. Reidel Pub. Co..
Graham Priest (2006). In Contradiction: A Study of the Transconsistent. Oxford University Press.
Tuomas E. Tahko (2008). The Aristotelian Method and Aristotelian Metaphysics. In Patricia Hanna (ed.), An Anthology of Philosophical Studies. ATINER
Francesco Berto (2008). Adynaton and Material Exclusion. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (2):165 – 190.
Francesco Berto (2007). How to Sell a Contradiction. College Publications.
Francesco Berto (2006). Meaning, Metaphysics, and Contradiction. American Philosophical Quarterly 43 (4):283-297.
Graham Priest, Jc Beall & Bradley P. Armour-Garb (eds.) (2004). The Law of Non-Contradiction : New Philosophical Essays. Oxford University Press.
Venanzio Raspa (1999). Łukasiewicz on the Principle of Contradiction. Journal of Philosophical Research 24:57-112.
Greg Restall (2006). Laws of Non-Contradiction, Laws of the Excluded Middle, and Logics. In Graham Priest, J. C. Beall & Bradley Armour-Garb (eds.), The Law of Non-Contradiction: New Philosophical Essays. Clarendon Press
Added to index2009-05-20
Total downloads492 ( #801 of 1,725,833 )
Recent downloads (6 months)76 ( #13,274 of 1,725,833 )
How can I increase my downloads?