Preference and resistance to change do not always covary
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):112-113 (2000)
| Abstract | Nevin & Grace's primary argument against theory and research on behavioral momentum is that preference and resistance to change may not covary. The method for evaluating preference and resistance to change seems problematic. Moreover, the theory fails to account convincingly for effects of average overall time to primary reinforcement on choice and preference for unsegmented schedules. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJohn A. Nevin & Randolph C. Grace (2000). Behavioral Momentum: Empirical, Theoretical, and Metaphorical Issues. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):117-125.
K. Geoffrey White & Judy Cameron (2000). Resistance to Change, Contrast, and Intrinsic Motivation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):115-116.
Hernán I. Savastano & Ralph R. Miller (2004). Behavioral Momentum in Pavlovian Conditioning and the Learning/Performance Distinction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (5):694-695.
James E. Mazur (2000). Contextual Choice and Other Models of Preference. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):108-109.
Ben A. Williams & Matthew C. Bell (2000). The Uncertain Domain of Resistance to Change. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):116-117.
John A. Nevin & Randolph C. Grace (2000). Behavioral Momentum and the Law of Effect. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):73-90.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads3 ( #201,930 of 549,093 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
