Accountability, Aliens, and Psychopaths: A Reply to Shoemaker

Ethics 122 (3):562-574 (2012)
I respond here to an argument in David Shoemaker’s recent essay, “Attributability, Answerability, and Accountability: Toward a Wider Theory of Moral Responsibility.” Shoemaker finds that “Scanlonian” approaches to moral blame err insofar as they do not include a capacity to respond to moral considerations among the conditions on blameworthiness. Shoemaker argues that wrongdoers must be able to respond to moral reasons for their behavior to express the disrespect to which blaming attitudes like resentment respond. I offer reasons for rejecting this argument.
Keywords Psychopathy  Accountability  Blame  Normative Competence
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,357
External links
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA

    No citations found.

    Similar books and articles
    Helen Nissenbaum (1996). Accountability in a Computerized Society. Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (1):25-42.
    Marina Oshana (2004). Moral Accountability. Philosophical Topics 32 (1/2):255-274.
    Patricia S. Greenspan (2003). Responsible Psychopaths. Philosophical Psychology 16 (3):417 – 429.

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index


    Total downloads

    25 ( #58,706 of 1,088,810 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    6 ( #17,284 of 1,088,810 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature

    Start a new thread
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.