David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Religious Studies 28 (4):495 - 510 (1992)
I believe that Craig's arguments for the possibility of (DT) are important for two reasons: first, because the line he takes, though unsuccessful in my opinion, is the most plausible (or least implausible) line available; and second, because he sets forth with startling clarity some of the propositions that someone who takes this line must be willing to accept. But in the end, I shall argue, he not only fails to establish that (DT) is possible; he also fails in the lesser task of trying to undermine my own argument that (DT) is impossible. Although Craig nowhere gives formal shape it, his argument for the possibility of (DT) seems to run something like this: He first insists that certain propositions other than (DT) are possible in the broadly logical sense, and he then tries to deduce the possibility of (DT) from these other possibilities; that is, he casts about for some proposition p - perhaps a conjunction of several propositions - that will enable him to argue as follows: (1) p entails (DT). (2) p is possible in the broadly logical sense. (3) Therefore, (DT) is also possible in the broadly logical sense. And, of course, the challenge he faces in defending such an argument is this: If, for some p, he..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Raymond J. VanArragon (2001). Transworld Damnation and Craig's Contentious Suggestion. Faith and Philosophy 18 (2):241-260.
Eric Reitan (2002). Eternal Damnation and Blessed Ignorance: Is the Damnation of Some Incompatible with the Salvation of Any? Religious Studies 38 (4):429-450.
Wes Morriston (2002). Craig on the Actual Infinite. Religious Studies 38 (2):147-166.
Wes Morriston (2012). Beginningless Past and Endless Future. Faith and Philosophy 29 (4):444-450.
David B. Myers (2003). Rejoinder to William Lane Craig. Religious Studies 39 (4):427-430.
István Aranyosi (2010). Powers and the Mind–Body Problem. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 18 (1):57 – 72.
Lee Basham (2002). Why God Lied to Me: Salvationist Theism and Justice. Journal of Religious Ethics 30 (2):231 - 249.
Rik Peels (2006). Divine Foreknowledge and Eternal Damnation: The Theory of Middle Knowledge as Solution to the Soteriological Problem of Evil. Neue Zeitschrift für Systematicsche Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 48 (2):160-75.
David B. Myers (2003). Exclusivism, Eternal Damnation, and the Problem of Evil: A Critique of Craig's Molinist Soteriological Theodicy. Religious Studies 39 (4):407-419.
William Hasker (1997). Explanatory Priority: Transitive and Unequivocal, a Reply to William Craig. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (2):389-393.
Tibor R. Machan (1969). Note on Conceivability and Logical Possibility. Kinesis 2:39--42.
Mark Stephen Pestana (1992). Radical Freedom, Radical Evil, and the Possibility of Eternal Damnation. Faith and Philosophy 9 (4):500-507.
William Lane Craig (2005). Is “Craig's Contentious Suggestion” Really so Implausible? Faith and Philosophy 22 (3):358-362.
Added to index2011-04-24
Total downloads47 ( #92,810 of 1,911,919 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #82,928 of 1,911,919 )
How can I increase my downloads?