David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (3):387-406 (2007)
In recent work, Cheryl Misak has developed a novel justification of deliberative democracy rooted in Peircean epistemology. In this article, the author expands Misak's arguments to show that not only does Peircean pragmatism provide a justification for deliberative democracy that is more compelling than the justifications offered by competing liberal and discursivist views, but also fixes a specific conception of deliberative politics that is perfectionist rather than neutralist. The article concludes with a discussion of whether the `epistemic perfectionism' implied by the pragmatist argument could be endorsed by liberal democrats. Key Words: deliberative democracy epistemology liberalism Cheryl Misak Charles Peirce perfectionism pragmatism truth.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Matthew Festenstein (2010). Pragmatism, Inquiry and Political Liberalism. Contemporary Political Theory 9 (1):25.
Similar books and articles
Cheryl Misak (2002). Review: Truth, Rationality and Pragmatism: Themes From Peirce. [REVIEW] Mind 111 (441):119-122.
Cheryl Misak (1994). Pragmatism and the Transcendental Turn in Truth and Ethics. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 30 (4):739 - 775.
Cheryl Misak (2005). Pragmatism and Pluralism. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 41 (1):129 - 135.
Thom Brooks (2009). A Critique of Pragmatism and Deliberative Democracy. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 45 (1):pp. 50-54.
Cheryl Misak (2008). A Culture of Justification: The Pragmatist's Epistemic Argument for Democracy. Episteme 5 (1):pp. 94-105.
Cheryl Misak (2008). A CULTURE OF JUSTIFICATION: THE PRAGMATIST'S EPISTEMIC ARGUMENT FOR DEMOCRACY11.This Paper has Been Improved by the Comments of David Dyzenhaus and David Estlund. Some of the Material is Drawn From Misak (2000) and (in Press). [REVIEW] Episteme 5 (1):94-105.
Cheryl J. Misak (2004). Making Disagreement Matter: Pragmatism and Deliberative Democracy. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 18 (1):9 - 22.
M. Bacon (2010). The Politics of Truth: A Critique of Peircean Deliberative Democracy. Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (9):1075-1091.
Gerald F. Gaus (2001). Truth, Politics, Morality: Pragmatism and Deliberation. Cheryl Misak. Mind 110 (439):796-799.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads34 ( #114,917 of 1,792,270 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #464,764 of 1,792,270 )
How can I increase my downloads?