David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Faith and Philosophy 5 (1):3-24 (1988)
In my paper, I defend a view that many would regard as self-evidently false: the view that God’s freedom, his power to act, is in no way limited by his essential properties. I divide the paper into five sections. In section i, I call attention to a special class of non-contingent propositions and try to identify an important feature of these propositions; in section ii, I provide some initial reasons. based in part upon the unique features of these special propositions, for thinking that God does have the power to perform actions which his essential properties entail he will never perform; in section iii, I call into question the assumption that a person has the power to do something only if it is logically possible that he will exercise that power; and, finally, in sections iv and v, I try to specify a sense in which divine freedom and the kind of human freedom required by the Free will Defense are in fact the same kind of freedom
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Tomis Kapitan (1991). Agency and Omniscience. Religious Studies 27 (1):105-120.
Edward Wierenga (2007). Perfect Goodness and Divine Freedom. Philosophical Books 48 (3):207-216.
Justin J. Daeley (2015). Divine Freedom and Contingency: An Intelligibility Problem for Theistic Compatibilists. Religious Studies 51 (4):563-582.
Thomas Talbott (1993). Theological Fatalism and Modal Confusion. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 33 (2):65-88.
Similar books and articles
T. J. Mawson (2005). Freedom, Human and Divine. Religious Studies 41 (1):55-69.
Peter Adamson (2003). Al-Kindi and the Mu‘Tazila: Divine Attributes, Creation and Freedom. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 13 (1):45-77.
William L. Rowe (2010). Response To: Divine Responsibility Without Divine Freedom. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 67 (1):37 - 48.
Coleen P. Zoller (2004). Determined but Free. Philosophy and Theology 16 (1):25-44.
C. P. Ragland (2005). Descartes on Divine Providence and Human Freedom. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 87 (2):159-188.
R. Zachary Manis (2011). Could God Do Something Evil? A Molinist Solution to the Problem of Divine Freedom. Faith and Philosophy 28 (2):209-223.
Guy Mansini (2004). On the Impossibility of a Demonstration of Theological Determinism. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 78 (4):573-580.
Patrick Kain (forthcoming). The Development of Kant's Conception of Divine Freedom. In Brandon Look (ed.), Leibniz and Kant. Oxford University Press
Keith E. Yandell (1999). God, Freedom, and Creation in Cross-Cultural Perspective. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1999:147-168.
Kevin Timpe (2012). An Analogical Approach to Divine Freedom. Proceedings of the Irish Philosophical Society:88-99.
Thomas Pink (2009). Power and Moral Responsibility. Philosophical Explorations 12 (2):127 – 149.
Jason Wyckoff (2010). On the Incompatibility of Divine Foreknowledge and Human Freedom. Sophia 49 (3):333-41.
Leigh C. Vicens (2012). Divine Determinism, Human Freedom, and the Consequence Argument. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 71 (2):145-155.
John J. Fitzgerald (2008). Timeless Troubles. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 82:203-215.
Chris Tucker (2008). Divine Hiddenness and the Value of Divine–Creature Relationships. Religious Studies 44 (3):269-287.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads43 ( #110,927 of 1,932,507 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #94,309 of 1,932,507 )
How can I increase my downloads?