Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||In this book, Robert Talisse critically examines the moral and political implications of pluralism, the view that our best moral thinking is indeterminate and that moral conflict is an inescapable feature of the human condition. Through a careful engagement with the work of William James, Isaiah Berlin, John Rawls, and their contemporary followers, Talisse distinguishes two broad types of moral pluralism: metaphysical and epistemic. After arguing that metaphysical pluralism does not offer a compelling account of value and thus cannot ground a viable conception of liberal politics, Talisse proposes and defends a distinctive variety of epistemic pluralism. According to this view, certain value conflicts are at present undecidable rather than intrinsic. Consequently, epistemic pluralism countenances the possibility that further argumentation, enhanced reflection, or the acquisition of more information could yield rational resolutions to the kinds of value conflicts that metaphysical pluralists deem irresolvable as such. Talisse’s epistemic pluralism hence prescribes a politics in which deep value conflicts are to be addressed by ongoing argumentation and free engagement among citizens; the epistemic pluralist thus sees liberal democracy is the proper political response to ongoing moral disagreement. While developing his view, Talisse engages central issues in contemporary liberal political theory, including toleration, state neutrality, public justification, and the accommodation of illiberal sub-cultures. This book will be of interest to ethicists, political philosophers, and political scientists.|
|Keywords||Political science Philosophy Cultural pluralism Political aspects Cultural pluralism Philosophy Liberalism Pragmatism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$49.92 used (62% off) $52.00 new (60% off) $91.79 direct from Amazon (30% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||JA71.T3548 2011|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Robert B. Talisse (2011). Value Pluralism and Liberal Politics. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (1):87-100.
Maria Baghramian & Attracta Ingram (eds.) (2000). Pluralism: The Philosophy and Politics of Diversity. Routledge.
Craig L. Carr (2010). Liberalism and Pluralism: The Politics of E Pluribus Unum. Palgrave Macmillan.
George Crowder (2007). Two Concepts of Liberal Pluralism. Political Theory 35 (2):121 - 146.
David Campbell & Morton Schoolman (eds.) (2008). The New Pluralism: William Connolly and the Contemporary Global Condition. Duke University Press.
James Bohman (2003). Reflexive Public Deliberation: Democracy and the Limits of Pluralism. Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (1):85-105.
John Gray (1998). Where Pluralists and Liberals Part Company. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 6 (1):17 – 36.
Robert B. Talisse (2008). Toward a Social Epistemic Comprehensive Liberalism. Episteme 5 (1):pp. 106-128.
F. Freyenhagen (2011). Taking Reasonable Pluralism Seriously: An Internal Critique of Political Liberalism. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (3):323-342.
Hans Theodorus Blokland (2011). Pluralism, Democracy and Political Knowledge: Robert a Dahl and His Critics on Modern Politics. Ashgate.
J. O'Neill (2003). Unified Science as Political Philosophy: Positivism, Pluralism and Liberalism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (3):575-596.
Glen Newey (2001). After Politics: The Rejection of Politics in Contemporary Liberal Philosophy. Palgrave.
Carmen Pavel (2004). William A. Galston, Liberal Pluralism: The Implications of Value Pluralism for Political Theory and Practice:Liberal Pluralism: The Implications of Value Pluralism for Political Theory and Practice. Ethics 114 (3):615-618.
Charles Blattberg (2000). From Pluralist to Patriotic Politics: Putting Practice First. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2011-03-25
Total downloads24 ( #57,917 of 739,387 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,287 of 739,387 )
How can I increase my downloads?