Patterns of Research Productivity in the Business Ethics Literature: Insights from Analyses of Bibliometric Distributions [Book Review]
Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Business Ethics 98 (1):137 - 151 (2011)
|Abstract||In any academic discipline, published articles in respective journals represent "production units" of scientific knowledge, and bibliometric distributions reflect the patterns in such outputs across authors or "producers." Closely following the analysis approach used for similar studies in the economics and finance literature, we present the first study to examine whether there exists an empirical regularity in the bibliometric patterns of research productivity in the business ethics literature. Our results present strong evidence that there indeed exists a distinct empirical regularity. It is the so-called Generalized Lotka's Law of scientific productivity pattern: the number of authors publishing ç papers is about Í /n c of those publishing one paper. We discuss the likely processes that underlie the productivity pattern postulated by the Generalized Lotka's Law. We find that the value of the exponent is equal to about 2.6 for the comprehensive bibliometric data across the two leading business ethics journals. The observed research productivity pattern in the business ethics area, a relatively young discipline, is interestingly very consistent with those found in much older, related business disciplines like economics, accounting, and finance. We discuss the general implications of our findings|
|Keywords||bibliometric distributions business ethics cumulative advantage empirical regularity knowledge creation Lotka’s Law research productivity patterns|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Zhenzhong Ma (2009). The Status of Contemporary Business Ethics Research: Present and Future. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 90 (3):255 - 265.
Kam C. Chan, Hung-Gay Fung & Jot Yau (2010). Business Ethics Research: A Global Perspective. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 95 (1):39 - 53.
Giulia Calabretta, Boris Durisin & Marco Ogliengo (2011). Uncovering the Intellectual Structure of Research in Business Ethics: A Journey Through the History, the Classics, and the Pillars of Journal of Business Ethics. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 104 (4):499-524.
Özgür Özmen Uysal (2010). Business Ethics Research with an Accounting Focus: A Bibliometric Analysis From 1988 to 2007. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 93 (1):137 - 160.
Murray Sabrin (2002). A Ranking of the Most Productive Business Ethics Scholars: A Five-Year Study. Journal of Business Ethics 36 (4):355 - 379.
Jong Yong Abdiel Foo (2009). A Study on Journal Self-Citations and Intra-Citing Within the Subject Category of Multidisciplinary Sciences. Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (4):491-501.
Richard A. Bernardi, Michael R. Melton, Scott D. Roberts & David F. Bean (2008). Fostering Ethics Research: An Analysis of the Accounting, Finance and Marketing Disciplines. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 82 (1):157 - 170.
A. Bernardi Richard, R. Melton Michael, D. Roberts Scott & F. Bean David (2008). Fostering Ethics Research: An Analysis of the Accounting, Finance and Marketing Disciplines. Journal of Business Ethics 82 (1).
V. Brand (2009). Empirical Business Ethics Research and Paradigm Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics 86 (4):429 - 449.
Joseph A. Petrick, Wesley Cragg & Martha Sañudo (2011). Business Ethics in North America: Trends and Challenges. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 104 (S1):51-62.
Added to index2010-06-30
Total downloads3 ( #213,863 of 739,406 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,406 )
How can I increase my downloads?