Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy in the Contemporary World 13 (2):4-10 (2006)
|Abstract||For contemporary democrats, Socrates is a paradox: he is both the paragon of intellectual integrity and the archenemy of democracy. In this essay, the author attempts to navigate this paradox. By offering a revised account of the Socratic elenchus and an examination of Socrates’ objections to democracy, the author proposes a view according to which Socrates provides a compelling image of democracy citizenship. This image is then used to criticize and inform current versions of deliberative democracy|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Larry May (2004). Dana Villa, Socratic Citizenship:Socratic Citizenship. Ethics 114 (3):641-643.
Eric C. Mullis (2009). On Being a Socratic Philosophy Instructor. Teaching Philosophy 32 (4):345-359.
Gregory Vlastos (1980). The Philosophy of Socrates: A Collection of Critical Essays. University of Notre Dame Press.
Gregory Vlastos (1971). The Philosophy of Socrates. Garden City, N.Y.,Anchor Books.
Raphael Woolf (2002). Consistency and Akrasia in Plato's Protagoras. Phronesis 47 (3):224-252.
Christopher S. King (2008). Wisdom, Moderation, and Elenchus in Plato's Apology. Metaphilosophy 39 (3):345–362.
Gareth Matthews (2009). Whatever Became of the Socratic Elenchus? Philosophical Analysis in Plato. Philosophy Compass 4 (3):439-450.
Julie Piering (2010). Irony and Shame in Socratic Ethics. International Philosophical Quarterly 50 (4):473-488.
Peter Boghossian (2011). Socratic Pedagogy: Perplexity, Humiliation, Shame and a Broken Egg. Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (7):710-720.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #86,111 of 740,333 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,960 of 740,333 )
How can I increase my downloads?