Two‐faced liberalism: John Gray's pluralist politics and the reinstatement of enlightenment liberalism
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Critical Review 14 (4):441-458 (2000)
Abstract In Two Faces of Liberalism, John Gray pursues the dual agenda of condemning familiar liberal theories for perpetuating the failed ?Enlightenment project,? and promoting his own version of anti?Enlightenment liberalism, which he calls ?modus vivendi.? However, Gray's critical apparatus is insufficient to capture accurately the highly influential ?political? liberalism of John Rawls. Moreover, Gray's modus vivendi faces serious challenges raised by Rawls concerning stability. In order to respond to the Rawlsian objections, Gray would have to reinstate the aspirations and principles characteristic of Enlightenment theories of liberalism.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Robert Talisse (2005). Social Epistemology and the Politics of Omission. Episteme 2 (2):107-118.
Peter Lassman (2006). Pluralism and its Discontents: John Gray's Counter‐Enlightenment. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 9 (2):211-225.
George Crowder (2006). Gray and the Politics of Pluralism. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 9 (2):171-188.
Similar books and articles
Struan Jacobs (1990). Post‐Liberalism Vs. Temperate Liberalism. Critical Review 4 (3):365-375.
Robert B. Talisse (2003). Rawls on Pluralism and Stability. Critical Review 15 (1-2):173-194.
J. W. Tate (2010). A Sententious Divide: Erasing the Two Faces of Liberalism. Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (8):953-980.
Michael Bacon (2010). Breaking Up is Hard to Do. Social Theory and Practice 36 (3):365-384.
D. F. B. Tucker (1988). Liberalism, Marxism and Social Democracy. Critical Review 2 (2-3):133-148.
George Crowder (1998). John Gray's Pluralist Critique of Liberalism. Journal of Applied Philosophy 15 (3):287–298.
John Gray (1998). Where Pluralists and Liberals Part Company. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 6 (1):17 – 36.
James Schmidt (1999). Liberalism and Enlightenment in Eighteenth‐Century Germany. Critical Review 13 (1-2):31-53.
David Dyzenhaus (1996). Liberalism After the Fall: Schmitt, Rawls and the Problem of Justification. Philosophy and Social Criticism 22 (3):9-37.
Robert S. Taylor (2011). Reconstructing Rawls: The Kantian Foundations of Justice as Fairness. Penn State University Press.
Ruth Abbey (2007). Back Toward a Comprehensive Liberalism? Justice as Fairness, Gender, and Families. Political Theory 35 (1):5 - 28.
David McCabe (2010). Modus Vivendi Liberalism: Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press.
Blain Neufeld (2005). Civic Respect, Political Liberalism, and Non-Liberal Societies. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 4 (3):275-299.
Dazhi Yao (2008). Postmodernist Liberalism: A Critique of Richard Rorty's Political Philosophy. [REVIEW] Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (3):455-463.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-10-18
Total downloads2 ( #372,332 of 1,140,004 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?