Graduate studies at Western
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (1):87-100 (2011)
|Abstract||Contemporary Neo-Berlinians contend that value pluralism is the best account of the moral universe we inhabit; they also contend that value pluralism provides a powerful case for liberalism. In this paper, I challenge both claims. Specifically, I will examine the arguments offered in support of value pluralism; finding them lacking, I will then offer some reasons for thinking that value pluralism is not an especially promising view of our moral universe|
|Keywords||Pluralism Liberalism Values Regret Berlin, Isaiah Galston, William Crowder, George|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Carmen Pavel (2004). William A. Galston, Liberal Pluralism: The Implications of Value Pluralism for Political Theory and Practice:Liberal Pluralism: The Implications of Value Pluralism for Political Theory and Practice. Ethics 114 (3):615-618.
Thomas Fossen (2008). Agonistic Critiques of Liberalism: Perfection and Emancipation. Contemporary Political Theory 7 (4):376–394.
John Gray (1998). Where Pluralists and Liberals Part Company. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 6 (1):17 – 36.
Robert B. Talisse (2010). Does Value Pluralism Entail Liberalism? Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (3):303-320.
George Crowder (2007). Two Concepts of Liberal Pluralism. Political Theory 35 (2):121 - 146.
Craig L. Carr (2010). Liberalism and Pluralism: The Politics of E Pluribus Unum. Palgrave Macmillan.
Maria Baghramian & Attracta Ingram (eds.) (2000). Pluralism: The Philosophy and Politics of Diversity. Routledge.
Added to index2010-05-22
Total downloads41 ( #32,763 of 739,786 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 739,786 )
How can I increase my downloads?