David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (5):613-630 (2012)
Cosmopolitan principles of justice tell us that it is the responsibility of the wealthy to ensure the immediate transfer of resources to the poor. Yet, it cannot be denied that most countries, and most individual citizens, seem unwilling to act as these principles demand. At issue is motivation: although many people would agree that cosmopolitan principles of justice are right, at least to some extent, few seem motivationally inspired to act upon them. This paper evaluates one set of proposals for securing the transfer of resources from the wealthy to the poor, namely, those that suggest that the right way to achieve cosmopolitan objectives is to generate institutions that will, over time, produce cosmopolitans. I argue that we should focus, doubly, on the generation of supra-national institutions as a way to create a?global demos? and on harnessing the motivational resources available at the nation-state level.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
John Rawls (1999). The Law of Peoples. Harvard University Press.
Thomas Nagel (2005). The Problem of Global Justice. Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (2):113–147.
David Miller (2001). On Nationality. Mind 110 (438):512-516.
Simon Caney (2005). Justice Beyond Borders: A Global Political Theory. Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Luke Ulaş (forthcoming). Transforming the State System? On Statist Cosmopolitanism. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy:1-20.
Christine Straehle (forthcoming). Falling Into the Justice Gap? Between Duties of Social and Global Justice. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy:1-17.
Similar books and articles
Patti Tamara Lenard (2010). Motivating Cosmopolitanism? A Skeptical View. Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (3):346-371.
Gillian Brock (2005). Egalitarianism, Ideals, and Cosmopolitan Justice. Philosophical Forum 36 (1):1–30.
András Miklós (2011). The Basic Structure and the Principles of Justice. Utilitas 23 (2):161-182.
Edward Song (2010). Subjectivist Cosmopolitanism and the Morality of Intervention. Journal of Social Philosophy 41 (2):137-151.
Luis Cabrera (2004). Political Theory of Global Justice: A Cosmopolitan Case for the World State. Routledge.
Soran Reader (2007). Cosmopolitan Pacifism. Journal of Global Ethics 3 (1):87 – 103.
Aaron Maltais (2008). Global Warming and the Cosmopolitan Political Conception of Justice. Environmental Politics 17 (4):592-609.
Holly Lawford-Smith (2012). The Motivation Question: Arguments From Justice, and From Humanity. British Journal of Political Science 42:661-678.
Niclas Rönnström (2011). Cosmopolitan Communication and the Broken Dream of a Common Language. Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (3):260-282.
Kok-Chor Tan (2002). Liberal Nationalism and Cosmopolitan Justice. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (4):431-461.
Bruce Landesman (2012). Brock’s Cosmopolitanism: Sensible but Incomplete. Diametros 31 (31):146-156.
Christian Barry & Pablo Gilabert (2008). Does Global Egalitarianism Provide an Impractical and Unattractive Ideal of Justice? International Affairs 84 (5):1025-1039.
Gillian Brock (2002). Why the Heldian Model of Cosmopolitan Democracy Retains Its Promise Despite Kymlicka's Criticisms. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 9 (2):31-39.
Daniel Weinstock (2009). Motivating the Global Demos. Metaphilosophy 40 (1):92-108.
Added to index2012-11-10
Total downloads7 ( #428,395 of 1,907,401 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #466,442 of 1,907,401 )
How can I increase my downloads?