David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Erkenntnis 78 (1):183-200 (2013)
We develop a multi-agent deontic action logic to study the logical behaviour of two types of deontic conditionals: (1) conditional obligations, having the form "If group H were to perform action aH, then, in group F's interest, group G ought to perform action aG" and (2) conditional permissions, having the form "If group H were to perform action aH, then, in group F's interest, group G may perform action aG". First, we define a formal language for multi-agent deontic action logic and a class of consequentialist models to interpret the formulas of the language. Second, we define a transformation that converts any strategic game into a consequentialist model. Third, we show that an outcome a* is a Nash equilibrium of a strategic game if and only if a conjunction of certain conditional permissions is true in the consequentialist model that results from the transformation of that strategic game.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Christian List (2011). Group Agency: The Possibility, Design, and Status of Corporate Agents. Oxford University Press.
Nuel D. Belnap (2001). Facing the Future: Agents and Choices in Our Indeterminist World. Oxford University Press on Demand.
John Francis Horty (2001). Agency and Deontic Logic. Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Ming Xu (forthcoming). Combinations of Stit with Ought and Know. Journal of Philosophical Logic:1-27.
John Horty (2014). Deontic Modals: Why Abandon the Classical Semantics? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 95 (4):424-460.
Similar books and articles
Churn-Jung Liau (2001). A Logical Analysis of the Relationship Between Commitment and Obligation. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 10 (2):237-261.
Barteld Kooi & Allard Tamminga (2008). Moral Conflicts Between Groups of Agents. Journal of Philosophical Logic 37 (1):1-21.
Krister Segerberg (2012). DΔL: A Dynamic Deontic Logic. Synthese 185 (S1):1-17.
Richard Evans (2010). Introducing Exclusion Logic as a Deontic Logic. DEON 2010 10 (1):179-195.
Thorsten Clausing (2002). A Syntactic Framework with Probabilistic Beliefs and Conditionals for the Analysis of Strategic Form Games. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 11 (3):335-348.
Lauri Carlson (1994). Logic for Dialogue Games. Synthese 99 (3):377 - 415.
Rosja Mastop (2011). Norm Performatives and Deontic Logic. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 7 (2):83-105.
Cristina Bicchieri & Oliver Schulte (1996). Common Reasoning About Admissibility. Erkenntnis 45 (2-3):299 - 325.
Oliver Schulte (1996). Common Reasoning About Admissibility. Erkenntnis 45 (2/3):299 - 325.
Marcelo E. Coniglio & Newton M. Peron (2009). A Paraconsistentist Approach to Chisholm's Paradox. Principia 13 (3):299-326.
John F. Horty (1996). Agency and Obligation. Synthese 108 (2):269 - 307.
Added to index2011-11-25
Total downloads40 ( #118,906 of 1,932,501 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #333,140 of 1,932,501 )
How can I increase my downloads?