Proving the principle: Taking geodesic dynamics too seriously in Einstein's theory

In this paper I critically review the long history of attempts to formulate and derive the geodesic principle, which claims that massive bodies follow geodesic paths in general relativity theory. I argue that if the principle is interpreted as a dynamical law of motion describing the actual evolution of gravitating bodies as endorsed by Einstein, then it is impossible to apply the law to massive bodies in a way that is coherent with his own field equations. Rejecting this canonical interpretation, I propose an alternative interpretation of the geodesic principle as a type of universality thesis analogous to the universality behavior exhibited in thermal systems during phase transitions
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/j.shpsb.2011.12.002
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,280
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Robert Batterman (2005). Critical Phenomena and Breaking Drops: Infinite Idealizations in Physics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 36 (2):225-244.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Mathias Frisch (2011). Principle or Constructive Relativity. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 42 (3):176-183.
Michel Ghins & Tim Budden (2001). The Principle of Equivalence. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 32 (1):33-51.
Olivier Darrigol (2007). A Faradayan Principle for Selecting Classical Field Theories. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 21 (1):35 – 55.
G. Granek (2000). Poincare's Contributions to Relativistic Dynamics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 31 (1):15-48.
Moti Mizrahi (2013). On Proving Too Much. Acta Analytica 28 (3):353-358.
J. Bub (2000). Quantum Mechanics as a Principle Theory. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 31 (1):75-94.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

45 ( #106,063 of 1,932,541 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

21 ( #27,516 of 1,932,541 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.