David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 80 (2):249 - 261 (2008)
While a large amount of work has been done to understand public good and to construct conceptual models explaining the antecedents of collective action, current literature is flawed in that most of them only examine the lower-level public good and attribute people's participation in collective action to external variables. It pays little to the developmental nature of collective action. Utilizing Ken Wilber's theory of integral psychology, this paper proposes a holistic definition of public good, emphasizing its different levels of development. The paper also introduces an integral model of collective action that explains the antecedents of collective action in terms of not only the external individual behavior and social factors but also the internal aspects of individuals, organization, and society.
|Keywords||collective action public good developmental psychology spirituality integral psychology psychology value|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Immanuel Kant (2007/1951). Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics. In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Journal of Philosophy. Blackwell Pub. Ltd. 507-508.
Thomas L. Carson (2003). Self-Interest and Business Ethics: Some Lessons of the Recent Corporate Scandals. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 43 (4):389 - 394.
Ken W. Parry & Sarah B. Proctor-Thomson (2002). Perceived Integrity of Transformational Leaders in Organisational Settings. Journal of Business Ethics 35 (2):75 - 96.
Domènec Melé (2003). The Challenge of Humanistic Management. Journal of Business Ethics 44 (1):77 - 88.
M. S. Singer & A. E. Singer (1997). Observer Judgements About Moral Agents' Ethical Decisions: The Role of Scope of Justice and Moral Intensity. Journal of Business Ethics 16 (5):473 - 484.
Citations of this work BETA
Nitish Singh, Yung-Hwal Park & Kevin Lehnert (2015). Research Note and Review of the Empirical Ethical Decision-Making Literature: Boundary Conditions and Extensions. Journal of Business Ethics 129 (1):195-219.
Julie Rayner, Alan Lawton & Helen M. Williams (2012). Organizational Citizenship Behavior and the Public Service Ethos: Whither the Organization? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 106 (2):117-130.
Similar books and articles
Margaret P. Gilbert (2006). Rationality in Collective Action. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (1):3-17.
Nicholas Bardsley (2007). On Collective Intentions: Collective Action in Economics and Philosophy. [REVIEW] Synthese 157 (2):141 - 159.
Timothy J. Hargrave (2009). Moral Imagination, Collective Action, and the Achievement of Moral Outcomes. Business Ethics Quarterly 19 (1):87-104.
Christopher Kutz (2000). Acting Together. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (1):1-31.
Raimo Tuomela (1992). On the Structural Aspects of Collective Action and Free-Riding. Theory and Decision 32 (2):165-202.
Daniel Little (1988). Collective Action and the Traditional Village. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 1 (1):41-58.
Boris Hennig (2006). Social Facts Explained and Presupposed. In Nikos Psarros & Katinka Schulte-Ostermann (eds.), Facets of Sociality. Ontos Verlag
Zachary Ernst & Sara Rachel Chant (2007). Collective Action as Individual Choice. Studia Logica 86 (3):415 - 434.
Sara Rachel Chant (2007). Unintentional Collective Action. Philosophical Explorations 10 (3):245 – 256.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads16 ( #167,478 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #183,615 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?