David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 190 (16):3625-3649 (2013)
While it is widely agreed that decoherence will not solve the measurement problem, decoherence has been used to explain the “emergence of classicality” and to eliminate the need for a Copenhagen edict that some systems simply have to be treated as classical via a quantum-classical “cut”. I argue that decoherence still relies on such a cut. Decoherence accounts derive classicality only in virtue of their incompleteness, by omission of part of the entangled system of which the classical-appearing subsystem is a part. I argue that this omission is only justified by implicit classical assumptions that objectify a subsystem and are employed via either a traditional Copenhagen cut or a functionally equivalent imposition of separability on a system in a non-separable state. I argue that decoherence cannot derive classicality without assuming it in some other form, and I provide an analysis of when it is appropriate to make these otherwise implicit classical assumptions by adopting a minimalistic Copenhagen-style approach to measurement. Finally, I argue that, ironically, the conditions for making these assumptions may be better satisfied in standard measurement situations than in cases of environmental monitoring
|Keywords||Decoherence Heisenberg cut Copenhagen interpretation Bohr Measurement Classical assumptions|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Jeffrey Bub (1998). Interpreting the Quantum World. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (4):637-641.
Guido Bacciagaluppi (2008). The Role of Decoherence in Quantum Mechanics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Bernard D' Espagnat (1976). Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Addison-Wesley, Advanced Book Program.
Don Howard (1994). Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Kristian Camilleri (2009). A History of Entanglement: Decoherence and the Interpretation Problem. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 40 (4):290-302.
Citations of this work BETA
Henrik Zinkernagel (2016). Niels Bohr on the Wave Function and the Classical/Quantum Divide. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 53:9-19.
Similar books and articles
Olimpia Lombardi, Sebastian Fortin & Mario Castagnino (2012). The Problem of Identifying the System and the Environment in the Phenomenon of Decoherence. In Henk W. de Regt (ed.), Epsa Philosophy of Science: Amsterdam 2009. Springer 161--174.
Claus Emmeche, Simo Koppe & Frederick Stjernfelt (1997). Explaining Emergence: Toward an Ontology of Levels. [REVIEW] Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 28 (1):83-119.
Guido Bacciagaluppi & Meir Hemmo (1994). Making Sense of Approximate Decoherence. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:345 - 354.
Fred Abong, Quantum Irony and Classical Common Sense: Encouraging Rortian Solidarity and the Postmetaphysical Culture Through Decoherence and the Copenhagen Interpretation.
Andrew Elby (1994). The 'Decoherence' Approach to the Measurement Problem in Quantum Mechanics. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:355 - 365.
Amit Hagar (2012). Decoherence: The View From the History and the Philosophy of Science. Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. London A 375 (1975).
Mario Castagnino & Olimpia Lombardi (2005). Self-Induced Decoherence and the Classical Limit of Quantum Mechanics. Philosophy of Science 72 (5):764-776.
Osvaldo Pessoa (1997). Can the Decoherence Approach Help to Solve the Measurement Problem? Synthese 113 (3):323-346.
Osvaldo Pessoa Jr (1997). Can the Decoherence Approach Help to Solve the Measurement Problem? Synthese 113 (3):323-346.
Osvaldo Pessoa Jr (1997). Can the Decoherence Approach Help to Solve the Measurement Problem? Synthese 113 (3):323 - 346.
Hanneke Janssen, Reconstructing Reality: Environment-Induced Decoherence, the Measurement Problem, and the Emergence of Definiteness in Quantum Mechanics.
Guido Bacciagaluppi (2007). Probability, Arrow of Time and Decoherence. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 38 (2):439-456.
Carlo Cellucci (2000). Analytic Cut Trees. Logic Journal of the IGPL 8 (6):733-750.
Added to index2012-11-16
Total downloads25 ( #189,827 of 1,940,986 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #103,238 of 1,940,986 )
How can I increase my downloads?