David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 94 (2):149 - 155 (2010)
What are the common denominators for success when we consider increasing gas efficiency and enhancing creativity in organizations? As an analogy, the principles of increasing gas efficiency are applicable to enhancing creativity in organizations: Plan activities in advance, allocate sufficient time, resources, and set a SMART goal with clear priority and focus. Identify talent in ourselves and others and do not fall into the temptation of following others. Big ideas take time. Maintain momentum, avoid interruptions, incorporate new technologies, information, and feedback, and modify action to achieve goals. We have 100% control of our thoughts and action. Stop idling, take action, and do it now. If everyone contributes just a little, the cumulative effect over time can be huge. If we have the knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSA) for doing the right things that will benefit humanity and the whole world, but fail to do them, is this ethical? We, the managers, need to focus on what we have done and what we have failed to do, change our thinking, change our behavior, and accomplish our goals
|Keywords||gas efficiency creativity can do will do human resource sustainability|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Thomas Li-Ping Tang & Yuh-Jia Chen (2008). Intelligence Vs. Wisdom: The Love of Money, Machiavellianism, and Unethical Behavior Across College Major and Gender. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 82 (1):1 - 26.
Citations of this work BETA
Qinxuan Gu, Thomas Li-Ping Tang & Wan Jiang (forthcoming). Does Moral Leadership Enhance Employee Creativity? Employee Identification with Leader and Leader–Member Exchange (LMX) in the Chinese Context. Journal of Business Ethics.
Thomas Li-Ping Tang & Toto Sutarso (2013). Falling or Not Falling Into Temptation? Multiple Faces of Temptation, Monetary Intelligence, and Unethical Intentions Across Gender. Journal of Business Ethics 116 (3):529-552.
Jingqiu Chen, Thomas Li-Ping Tang & Ningyu Tang (2013). Temptation, Monetary Intelligence (Love of Money), and Environmental Context on Unethical Intentions and Cheating. Journal of Business Ethics:1-23.
Caroline Gauthier & Corine Genet (2013). Nanotechnologies and Green Knowledge Creation: Paradox or Enhancer of Sustainable Solutions? Journal of Business Ethics:1-13.
Similar books and articles
Dustin Stokes (2011). Minimally Creative Thought. Metaphilosophy 42 (5):658-681.
Albert Low (2006). Creative Thinking. World Futures 62 (6):455 – 463.
Alessandro Tomasi (2009). Technological Paradigm in Ancient Taoism. Techne 13 (3):190-205.
Steven N. Durlauf (2008). Affirmative Action, Meritocracy, and Efficiency. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (2):131-158.
David Myers (2003). The Social Psychology of Sustainability. World Futures 59 (3 & 4):201 – 211.
Peter Carruthers (2011). Creative Action in Mind. Philosophical Psychology 24 (4):437 - 461.
S. Baucus Melissa, I. Norton William, A. Baucus David & E. Human Sherrie (2008). Fostering Creativity and Innovation Without Encouraging Unethical Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 81 (1).
Melissa S. Baucus, William I. Norton, David A. Baucus & Sherrie E. Human (2008). Fostering Creativity and Innovation Without Encouraging Unethical Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 81 (1):97 - 115.
Added to index2009-11-23
Total downloads10 ( #165,277 of 1,410,079 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #107,970 of 1,410,079 )
How can I increase my downloads?