The dynamical systems accounts for phenomenology of immanent time: An interpretation by revisiting a robotics synthetic study
Journal of Consciousness Studies 11 (9):5-24 (2004)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | Immanence Phenomenology Robotics Science Time | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJeffrey Yoshimi (2007). Mathematizing Phenomenology. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6 (3).
Lee McCauley (2007). AI Armageddon and the Three Laws of Robotics. Ethics and Information Technology 9 (2).
Ron Chrisley (2009). Synthetic Phenomenology. International Journal of Machine Consciousness 1 (01):53-70.
Daniel A. Weiskopf (2004). The Place of Time in Cognition. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (1):87-105.
Ronald L. Chrisley (1994). Taking Embodiment Seriously: Nonconceptual Content and Robotics. In Kenneth M. Ford, C. Glymour & Patrick Hayes (eds.), Android Epistemology. MIT Press.
Martin Heidegger (1972). On Time and Being. New York,Harper & Row.
David Morris (2001). Lived Time and Absolute Knowing: Habit and Addiction From Infinite Jest to the Phenomenology of Spirit. Clio 30:375-415.
Tim Smithers (1998). In Time and Over Time. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):651-652.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads10 ( #106,150 of 548,969 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,969 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
