Philosophical Quarterly 60 (239):343-354 (2010)
|Abstract||It is controversial whether masses (what mass nouns refer to) exist. But on the assumption that they do, here are two uncontroversial facts about them: first, they satisfy a fusion principle which takes any set of masses of kind K and yields a mass fusion of kind K; secondly, a mass must have all and only the same parts at every time at which it exists. These two theses are usually built into the concept 'mass'. I argue that the latter follows from the former. This shows that the concept 'mass' is unified, not gerrymandered. Moreover, since my arguments show that any entity which follows a certain fusion principle is also mereologically constant, and since these two properties are sufficient for being a mass, my arguments make it easier to argue that there are masses.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ariel Meirav (2009). Properties That Four-Dimensional Objects Cannot Have. Metaphysica 10 (2):135-148.
Chris Fraser (2007). Language and Ontology in Early Chinese Thought. Philosophy East and West 57 (4):420-456.
Jill Hargis (2011). From Demonization of the Masses to Democratic Practice in the Work of Nietzsche, Heidegger, and Foucault. Human Studies 34 (4):373-392.
Hsin-I. Liu (2006). The Impossibility of the Public. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:119-124.
Jonathan Schaffer (2003). The Problem of Free Mass: Must Properties Cluster? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (1):125–138.
Henry Laycock (2011). Every Sum or Parts Which Are Water is Water. Humana Mente 19 (1):41-55.
Added to index2009-04-28
Total downloads42 ( #27,099 of 549,754 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,754 )
How can I increase my downloads?