The status of teleological theories of content
Philosophical Writings 21:25-37 (2002)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesP. M. Pietroski (1992). Intentionality and Teleological Error. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 73 (3):267-82.
Justine Kingsbury (2006). A Proper Understanding of Millikan. Acta Analytica 21 (40):23-40.
Karen Neander, Teleological Theories of Mental Content. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Ruth G. Millikan (2002). Teleological Theories of Mental Content. In L. Nagel (ed.), Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. Macmillan.
Frank Jackson (2006). The Epistemological Objection to Opaque Teleological Theories of Content. In Graham F. Macdonald & David Papineau (eds.), Teleosemantics. Oxford University Press.
Michael V. Antony (2006). How to Argue Against (Some) Theories of Content. Iyyun 55 (July):265-286.
William T. Wojtach (2009). Reconsidering Perceptual Content. Philosophy of Science 76 (1):22-43.
James Rountree (1997). The Plausibility of Teleological Content Ascriptions: A Reply to Pietroski. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78 (4):404-20.
Mark Rowlands (1997). Teleological Semantics. Mind 106 (422):279-304.
Peter Vallentyne (1988). Teleology, Consequentialism, and the Past. Journal of Value Inquiry 22 (2):89-101.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
