Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (5):31-118 (2012)
|Abstract||Setting out to understand Frege, the scholar confronts a roadblock at the outset: We just have little to go on. Much of the unpublished work and correspondence is lost, probably forever. Even the most basic task of imagining Frege's intellectual life is a challenge. The people he studied with and those he spent daily time with are little known to historians of philosophy and logic. To be sure, this makes it hard to answer broad questions like: 'Who influenced Frege?' But the information vacuum also creates local problems of textual interpretation. Say we encounter a sentence that may be read as alluding to a scientific dispute. Should it be read that way? To answer, we'd need to address prior questions. Is it ..|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jamie Tappenden (1995). Geometry and Generality in Frege's Philosophy of Arithmetic. Synthese 102 (3):319 - 361.
Mark Textor (2009). Unsaturatedness: Wittgenstein's Challenge, Frege's Answer. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 109 (1pt1):61-82.
Jamie Tappenden (1997). Metatheory and Mathematical Practice in Frege. Philosophical Topics 25 (2):213-264.
Charles Travis (2008). To Represent as So. In David K. Levy & Edoardo Zamuner (eds.), Wittgenstein's Enduring Arguments. Routledge.
Jan Wolenński (1997). Hans Sluga (Ed.), The Philosophy of Frege. A Four-Volume Collection of Scholarly Articles on All Aspects of Frege's Philosophy, Vol.1: General Assessments and Historical Accounts of Frege's Philosophy, Vol.2: Logic and Foundations of Mathematics in Frege's Philosophy, Vol.3: Meaning and Ontology in Frege's Philosophy, Vol.4: Sense and Reference in Frege's Philosophy. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 46 (3).
Uwe Dathe (1995). Gottlob Frege Und Rudolf Eucken—Gesprächspartner in der Herausbildungsphase der Modernen Logik. History and Philosophy of Logic 16 (2):245-255.
Gregory Currie (1983). I. Interpreting Frege: A Reply to Michael Dummett. Inquiry 26 (3):345 – 359.
Tom Ricketts & Michael D. Potter (eds.) (2010). The Cambridge Companion to Frege. Cambridge University Press.
Jamie Tappenden (2000). Frege on Axioms, Indirect Proof, and Independence Arguments in Geometry: Did Frege Reject Independence Arguments? Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 41 (3):271-315.
Joan Weiner (2007). What's in a Numeral? Frege's Answer. Mind 116 (463):677 - 716.
Added to index2012-02-23
Total downloads27 ( #45,781 of 549,087 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #10,333 of 549,087 )
How can I increase my downloads?