David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In Sarah Stroud & Christine Tappolet (eds.), Weakness of Will and Practical Irrationality. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 97--120 (2003)
After discussing de Sousa's view of emotion in akrasia, I suggest that emotions be viewed as nonconceptual perceptions of value (see Tappolet 2000). It follows that they can render intelligible actions which are contrary to one's better judgment. An emotion can make one's action intelligible even when that action is opposed by one's all-things-considered judgment. Moreover, an akratic action prompted by an emotion may be more rational than following one's better judgement, for it may be the judgement and not the perception which is in error. By contrast, "cool" akrasia is genuinely puzzling; it is not clear whether it exists.
|Keywords||Akrasia Emotion Value Davidson, D|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Alfred R. Mele (1983). Akrasia, Reasons, and Causes. Philosophical Studies 44 (3):345-368.
Jing Zhu & Paul Thagard (2002). Emotion and Action. Philosophical Psychology 15 (1):19 – 36.
Daniel Guevara (2009). The Will as Practical Reason and the Problem of Akrasia. The Review of Metaphysics 62 (3):525-550.
Sabine A. Döring (2003). Explaining Action by Emotion. Philosophical Quarterly 53 (211):214-230.
Amelie Rorty (1983). Akratic Believers. American Philosophical Quarterly 20 (2):175-183.
David Owens (2002). Epistemic Akrasia. The Monist 85 (3):381-397.
David Owens (2002). Epistemic Akrasia. The Monist 85 (3):381 - 397.
Arthur F. Walker (1989). The Problem of Weakness of Will. Noûs 23 (5):653-676.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads86 ( #11,439 of 1,012,973 )
Recent downloads (6 months)15 ( #7,004 of 1,012,973 )
How can I increase my downloads?