Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||These are some of the rules of classification and definition. But although nothing is more important in science than classifying and defining well, we need say no more about it here, because it depends much more on our knowledge of the subject matter being discussed than on the rules of logic. (Arnauld and Nicole (1683/1996) p.128).|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Helen De Cruz & Johan De Smedt (2010). The Innateness Hypothesis and Mathematical Concepts. Topoi 29 (1):3-13.
L. H. Hackstaff (1967). Systems of Formal Logic. Dordrecht, D. Reidel.
Volker Peckhaus (1999). 19th Century Logic Between Philosophy and Mathematics. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 5 (4):433-450.
A. T. Balaban (2005). Reflections About Mathematical Chemistry. Foundations of Chemistry 7 (3):289-306.
Kurt Jax (2007). Can We Define Ecosystems? On the Confusion Between Definition and Description of Ecological Concepts. Acta Biotheoretica 55 (4).
Michael Potter (2007). What is the Problem of Mathematical Knowledge? In Michael Potter, Mary Leng & Alexander Paseau (eds.), Mathematical Knowledge.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads53 ( #23,188 of 739,345 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,186 of 739,345 )
How can I increase my downloads?