Philosophical Quarterly 52 (209):511-525 (2002)
|Abstract||Reid said little in his published writings about his contemporary Joseph Priestley, but his unpublished work is largely devoted to the latter. Much of Priestley's philosophical thought- his materialism, his determinism, his Lockean scientific realism- was as antithetical to Reid's as was Hume's philosophy in a very different way. Neither Reid nor Priestley formulated a full response to the other. Priestley's response to Reid came very early in his career, and is marked by haste and immaturity. In his last decade Reid worried much about Priestley's materialism, but that concern never reached publication. I document Reid's unpublished response to Priestley, and also view Reid's response from Priestley's perspective, as deduced from his published works. Both thinkers attempted to base their arguments on Newtonian method. Reid's position is the more puzzling of the two, since he nowhere makes clear how Newtonian method favours mind-body dualism over materialism, which is the central debate between them|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Amit Hagar (2002). Thomas Reid and Non-Euclidean Geometry. Reid Studies 5 (2):54-64.
Rebecca Copenhaver (2006). Thomas Reid's Philosophy of Mind: Consciousness and Intentionality. Philosophy Compass 1 (3):279-289.
Daniel Mishori (2003). The Dilemmas of the Dual Channel: Reid on Consciousness and Reflection. Journal of Scottish Philosophy 1 (2):141-155.
Etienne Brun-Rovet (2002). Reid, Kant and the Philosophy of Mind. Philosophical Quarterly 52 (209):495-510.
Richard Price (1778/1977). A Free Discussion of the Doctrines of Materialism, and Philosophical Necessity, in a Correspondence Between Dr. Price and Dr. Priestley: To Which Are Added, by Dr. Priestley, an Introduction, Explaining the Nature of the Controversy, and Letters to Several Writers . [REVIEW] Kraus Reprint Co..
Joseph Priestley (1993). Political Writings. Cambridge University Press.
Rebecca Copenhaver (2006). Is Thomas Reid a Mysterian? Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (3):449-466.
Christopher Yeomans (2006). Thomas Reid and Some Regress Arguments. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 88 (1):54-81.
Todd Buras (2002). The Problem with Reid's Direct Realism. Philosophical Quarterly 52 (209):457-477.
Aaron Garrett (2004). In Defense of Elephants: Priestley on Reid on How to Be a Newtonian of the Mind. Journal of Scottish Philosophy 2 (2):137-153.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads11 ( #107,400 of 722,874 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?