David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In Carla Bagnoli (ed.), Morality and the Emotions. Oxford University Press (2011)
Neo-sentmentalism is the view that to judge that something has an evaluative property is to judge that some affective or emotional response is appropriate with respect to it. The difficulty in assessing neo-sentimentalism is that it allows for radically different versions. My aim is to spell out what I take to be its most plausible version. I distinguish between a normative version, which takes the concepts of appropriateness to be normative, and a descriptive version, which claims that appropriateness in emotions is a matter of correspondence to evaluative facts. I argue that the latter version can satisfy the normativity requirement that follows from Moore's Open Question Argument, that it is superior to the former with respect to the explanatory role of values, and with respect to the Wrong Kind of Reason Objection. Finally, I argue that the circularity that is involved is not vicious: understood epistemically, neo-sentimentalism remains instructive.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Christine Tappolet (2012). Valeurs Et Émotions, les Perspectives du Néo-Sentimentalisme. Dialogue 51 (1):7-30.
Hanno Sauer (2011). The Appropriateness of Emotions. Moral Judgment, Moral Emotions, and the Conflation Problem. Ethical Perspectives 18 (1):107-140.
Christopher Knapp (2003). De-Moralizing Disgustingness. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (2):253–278.
Karen Jones (2006). Metaethics and Emotions Research: A Response to Prinz. Philosophical Explorations 9 (1):45-53.
Lawrence Blum (2011). Empathy and Empirical Psychology: A Critique of Shaun Nichols's Neo-Sentimentalism. In Carla Bagnoli (ed.), Morality and the Emotions. Oxford University Press.
Antti Kauppinen (2013). Sentimentalism (International Encyclopedia of Ethics). In Hugh LaFollette (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Blackwell.
András Szigeti (2012). No Need to Get Emotional? Emotions and Heuristics. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (4):845-862.
Andrew Jordan & Stephanie Patridge (2012). Against the Moralistic Fallacy: A Modest Defense of a Modest Sentimentalism About Humor. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (1):83-94.
Justin D'Arms (2005). Two Arguments for Sentimentalism. Philosophical Issues 15 (1):1-21.
Michael B. Gill (2013). Humean Sentimentalism and Non-Consequentialist Moral Thinking. Hume Studies 37 (2):165-188.
François Schroeter (2006). The Limits of Sentimentalism. Ethics 116 (2):337-361.
Donald C. Hubin (2003). Desires, Whims, and Values. Journal of Ethics 7 (3):315-35.
Duncan Pritchard (2007). How to Be a Neo-Moorean. In Sanford Goldberg (ed.), Internalism and Externalism in Semantics and Epistemology. Oxford University Press. 68--99.
Heidi Maibom (2010). What Experimental Evidence Shows Us About the Role of Emotions in Moral Judgement. Philosophy Compass 5 (11):999-1012.
Added to index2011-04-18
Total downloads67 ( #24,825 of 1,139,979 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #39,122 of 1,139,979 )
How can I increase my downloads?