Universals in Second Scholasticism: A Comparative Study with Focus on the Theories of Francisco Suárez S. J. (1548–1617), João Poinsot O. P. (1589–1644) and Bartolomeo Mastri da Meldola O. F. M. Conv. (1602–1673)/Bonaventura Belluto O. F. M. Conv. (1600–1676) by Daniel Heider [Book Review]

Journal of the History of Philosophy 54 (1):165-166 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The debate on universals is, generally speaking, a well-known subject in the history of philosophy, but views on universals from the end of the sixteenth to the mid-seventeenth century—the object of Heider’s welcome contribution—are quite neglected. Such views are extremely sophisticated, drawing on the established traditions of Thomism and Scotism, in particular, but bringing them to a new level of technicality. Heider investigates three major positions: those of Francisco Suárez, João Poinsot, and the joint position of Bartolomeo Mastri and Bonaventura Belluto. The three views are chosen to..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Universals as Theoretical Entities.Paul Charles Hedengren - 1983 - Dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada)
ofM conv., Recensione a L'Eglise in.F. Uricchio - 1967 - Miscellanea Francescana 67:213-215.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
47 (#330,788)

6 months
13 (#182,749)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references