David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):221-222 (1998)
Chow (1996) offers a reconceptualization of statistical significance that is reasoned and comprehensive. Despite a somewhat rough presentation, his arguments are compelling and deserve to be taken seriously by the scientific community. It is argued that his characterization of literal replication, types of research, effect size, and experimental control are in need of revision.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Siu L. Chow (1989). Significance Tests and Deduction: Reply to Folger (1989). Philosophical Explorations.
Stephan Lewandowsky & Murray Maybery (1998). The Critics Rebutted: A Pyrrhic Victory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):210-211.
Andrew F. Hayes (1998). Reconnecting Data Analysis and Research Design: Who Needs a Confidence Interval? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):203-204.
Davis Baird (1984). Tests of Significance Violate the Rule of Implication. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:81 - 92.
Tom Engsted (2009). Statistical Vs. Economic Significance in Economics and Econometrics: Further Comments on McCloskey and Ziliak. Journal of Economic Methodology 16 (4):393-408.
John F. Kihlstrom (1998). If You've Got an Effect, Test its Significance; If You've Got a Weak Effect, Do a Meta-Analysis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):205-206.
Niels G. Waller & Wesley O. Johnson (1998). The Non-Significance of Straw Man Arguments. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):226-227.
Deirdre N. McCloskey & Stephen T. Ziliak (2008). Signifying Nothing: Reply to Hoover and Siegler. Journal of Economic Methodology 15 (1):39-55.
Zeno G. Swijtink (1998). A Plea for Popperian Significance Testing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):220-221.
Michael G. Shafto (1998). Costs and Benefits of Statistical Significance Tests. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):218-219.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #216,974 of 1,692,493 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #181,267 of 1,692,493 )
How can I increase my downloads?