David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (8):953-980 (2010)
The political philosopher John Gray is a foremost critic of the liberal tradition. But while many have engaged with Gray concerning aspects of this tradition, few have challenged Gray’s conception of the tradition as a whole. Yet it is precisely this broader, background element in Gray’s account that is most problematic and that requires excavation if we are to reveal the deeper shortcomings of his critique as a whole. This article challenges Gray’s claim, made in 2000, that the liberal tradition is capable of being understood in terms of two faces — one representing the ‘universalist’ aspects of that tradition and the other representing the more pragmatic, value-pluralist, modus vivendi aspects. By focusing on Gray’s erroneous interpretation of the key universalist figure of John Locke, we see how his dichotomous account of the liberal tradition collapses at both ends. The article then looks at Gray’s most recent defence of his critique of liberalism, in 2007, and shows how many of the errors that characterize his 2000 account are compounded in 2007 as Gray seeks to build on his earlier position in contradictory directions. In all these ways therefore, this article seeks to defend the integrity of the liberal tradition by showing how Gray’s excoriating critique falls short
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Robert B. Talisse (2000). Two‐Faced Liberalism: John Gray's Pluralist Politics and the Reinstatement of Enlightenment Liberalism. Critical Review 14 (4):441-458.
Struan Jacobs (1990). Post‐Liberalism Vs. Temperate Liberalism. Critical Review 4 (3):365-375.
Michael Bacon (2010). Breaking Up is Hard to Do. Social Theory and Practice 36 (3):365-384.
Ryszard Legutko (1994). On Postmodern Liberal Conservatism. Critical Review 8 (1):1-22.
John G. Bruhn (2009). The Functionality of Gray Area Ethics in Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics 89 (2):205 - 214.
Nicholas Rengger, The Exorcist? John Gray, Apocalyptic Religion and the Return to Realism in World Politics.
A. Wager (2001). Synaesthesia Misrepresented. Philosophical Psychology 14 (3):347-351.
George Crowder (1998). John Gray's Pluralist Critique of Liberalism. Journal of Applied Philosophy 15 (3):287–298.
Robert B. Talisse (2003). Rawls on Pluralism and Stability. Critical Review 15 (1-2):173-194.
John Gray (1998). Where Pluralists and Liberals Part Company. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 6 (1):17 – 36.
Guijun Zhuang & Alex S. L. Tsang (2008). A Study on Ethically Problematic Selling Methods in China with a Broaden Concept of Gray-Marketing. Journal of Business Ethics 79 (1/2):85 - 101.
Michael Sandel (2003). Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. In Derek Matravers & Jonathan E. Pike (eds.), Journal of Philosophy. Routledge, in Association with the Open University 336-343.
Craig L. Carr (2006). The Liberal Polity: An Inquiry Into the Logic of Civil Association. Palgrave Macmillan.
Roberto Frega (2012). A Pragmatist Critique of Liberal Epistemology: Towards a Practice-Based Account of Public Reason. Critical Horizons 12 (3):293 - 316.
Added to index2010-10-10
Total downloads30 ( #158,693 of 1,932,455 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #149,265 of 1,932,455 )
How can I increase my downloads?