Dr. Zilsel on the concept of physical law
Philosophical Review 52 (3):304-305 (1943)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesSteven M. Rosen (1976). Toward Relativization of Psychophysical "Relativity". Perceptual and Motor Skills 42:843-850.
John T. Roberts (2005). Measurability and Physical Laws. Synthese 144 (3):433Ð447.
Marshall Spector (1990). The Concept of Physical Law. International Studies in Philosophy 22 (3):149-150.
Paula Gaido (2011). The Purpose of Legal Theory: Some Problems with Joseph Raz's View. Law and Philosophy 30 (6):685-698.
Kenneth M. Ehrenberg (2011). Law is Not (Best Considered) an Essentially Contested Concept. International Journal of Law in Context 7:209-232.
Edgar Zilsel (2000). The Social Origins of Modern Science. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Norman Swartz (1985). The Concept of Physical Law. Cambridge University Press.
Edgar Zilsel (1942). The Genesis of the Concept of Physical Law. Philosophical Review 51 (3):245-279.
Fred Wilson (1987). Book Review:The Concept of Physical Law Norman Swartz. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 54 (1):130-.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads7 ( #133,479 of 549,088 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,088 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
