Ethics and Information Technology 6 (1):15-28 (2004)
|Abstract||This essay examines issues involving personal privacy and informed consent that arise at the intersection of information and communication technology (ICT) and population genomics research. I begin by briefly examining the ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) program requirements that were established to guide researchers working on the Human Genome Project (HGP). Next I consider a case illustration involving deCODE Genetics, a privately owned genetics company in Iceland, which raises some ethical concerns that are not clearly addressed in the current ELSI guidelines. The deCODE case also illustrates some ways in which an ICT technique known as data mining has both aided and posed special challenges for researchers working in the field of population genomics. On the one hand, data-mining tools have greatly assisted researchers in mapping the human genome and in identifying certain disease genes common in specific populations (which, in turn, has accelerated the process of finding cures for diseases that affect those populations). On the other hand, this technology has significantly threatened the privacy of research subjects participating in population genomics studies, who may, unwittingly, contribute to the construction of new groups (based on arbitrary and non-obvious patterns and statistical correlations) that put those subjects at risk for discrimination and stigmatization. In the final section of this paper I examine some ways in which the use of data mining in the context of population genomics research poses a critical challenge for the principle of informed consent, which traditionally has played a central role in protecting the privacy interests of research subjects participating in epidemiological studies.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Irene Pollach (2005). A Typology of Communicative Strategies in Online Privacy Policies: Ethics, Power and Informed Consent. Journal of Business Ethics 62 (3):221 - 235.
Aamir M. Jafarey (2002). Conflict of Interest Issues in Informed Consent for Research on Human Subjects: A South Asian Perspective. Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3).
Dirk van Rooy & Jacques Bus (2010). Trust and Privacy in the Future Internet—a Research Perspective. Identity in the Information Society 3 (2):397-404.
Richard A. Spinello (2004). Property Rights in Genetic Information. Ethics and Information Technology 6 (1):29-42.
Gordon R. Mitchell (2001). Defining the Subject of Consent in DNA Research. Journal of Medical Humanities 22 (1):41-53.
R. R. Kishore (2006). Biomedical Research and Mining of the Poor: The Need for Their Exclusion. Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):175-183.
Michael Zimmer (forthcoming). “But the Data is Already Public”: On the Ethics of Research in Facebook. Ethics and Information Technology.
Herman T. Tavani (1999). Informational Privacy, Data Mining, and the Internet. Ethics and Information Technology 1 (2):137-145.
Herman T. Tavani (1999). KDD, Data Mining, and the Challenge for Normative Privacy. Ethics and Information Technology 1 (4):265-273.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #93,336 of 549,068 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,068 )
How can I increase my downloads?