The uniqueness debate in computer ethics: What exactly is at issue, and why does it matter? [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethics and Information Technology 4 (1):37-54 (2002)
The purpose of this essay is to determinewhat exactly is meant by the claimcomputer ethics is unique, a position thatwill henceforth be referred to as the CEIUthesis. A brief sketch of the CEIU debate is provided,and an empirical case involving a recentincident of cyberstalking is briefly consideredin order to illustrate some controversialpoints of contention in that debate. To gain aclearer understanding of what exactly isasserted in the various claims about theuniqueness of computer ethics, and to avoidmany of the confusions currently associatedwith the term ``unique'', a precise definition ofthat term is proposed. We then differentiatetwo distinct and radically differentinterpretations of the CEIU thesis, based onarguments that can be found in the relevantcomputer ethics literature. The twointerpretations are critically analyzed andboth are shown to be inadequate in establishingthe CEIU thesis. We then examine and reject twoassumptions implicit in arguments advanced bothby CEIU advocates and their opponents. Inexposing and rejecting these assumptions, wesee why it is not necessary to accept theconclusions reached by either side in thisdebate. Finally, we defend the view thatcomputer ethics issues are both philosophicallyinteresting and deserving of our attention,regardless of whether those issues might alsohappen to be unique ethical issues
|Keywords||CEIU thesis ICT ethics cyberstalking moral issues moral principles objects of moral consideration uniqueness advocates uniqueness debate|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Luciano Floridi & J. W. Sanders (2001). Artificial Evil and the Foundation of Computer Ethics. Ethics and Information Technology 3 (1):55-66.
Marion Godman (2008). But is It Unique to Nanotechnology? Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (3):391-403.
Antonio Marturano (2002). The Role of Metaethics and the Future of Computer Ethics. Ethics and Information Technology 4 (1):71-78.
Kenneth Einar Himma (2003). The Relationship Between the Uniqueness of Computer Ethics and its Independence as a Discipline in Applied Ethics. Ethics and Information Technology 5 (4):225-237.
Erik Ugland & Jennifer Henderson (2007). Who is a Journalist and Why Does It Matter? Disentangling the Legal and Ethical Arguments. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 22 (4):241 – 261.
TerrellWard Bynum (2001). Computer Ethics: Its Birth and its Future. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 3 (2):109-112.
Karen D. Loch, Sue Conger & Effy Oz (1998). Ownership, Privacy and Monitoring in the Workplace: A Debate on Technology and Ethics. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 17 (6):199-209.
Luciano Floridi & J. W. Sanders (2002). Mapping the Foundationalist Debate in Computer Ethics. Ethics and Information Technology 4 (1):1-9.
Herman T. Tavani (2001). The State of Computer Ethics as a Philosophical Field of Inquiry: Some Contemporary Perspectives, Future Projections, and Current Resources. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 3 (2):97-108.
Walter Maner (1996). Unique Ethical Problems in Information Technology. Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (2):137-154.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads21 ( #67,420 of 1,008,333 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,735 of 1,008,333 )
How can I increase my downloads?