David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 79:85-102 (2005)
Recently much interest has been shown in the notion of intelligible species in the thought of Thomas Aquinas. Intelligible species supposedly explain humanknowing of the world and universals. However, in some cases, the historical context and the philosophical sources employed by Aquinas have been sorely neglected. As a result, new interpretations have been set forth which needlessly obscure an already controversial and perhaps even philosophically tenuous doctrine. Using a recent article by Houston Smit as an example of a novel and anachronistic modern interpretation of Aquinas’s abstractionism, this paper shows that Aquinas follows the intentional transference of Averroes who proposes a genuine doctrine of abstraction of intelligibles from experienced sensible particulars. The paper also shows that Aquinas uses the doctrine of primary and secondary causality from the Liber de causis when he asserts that human abstractive powers function only insofar as they are a participation in Divine illumination
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ignacio Silva (2013). Thomas Aquinas Holds Fast: Objections to Aquinas Within Today's Debate on Divine Action. Heythrop Journal 54 (4):658-667.
Václav Němec (2011). Tomášovo pojetí esence v De ente et essentia a jeho zdroje. Studia Neoaristotelica 8 (1):38-71.
John Lamont (1997). Aquinas on Divine Simplicity. The Monist 80 (4):521-538.
Brian Davies (1993). The Thought of Thomas Aquinas. Clarendon Press.
Derek J. Morrow (2006). Aquinas, Marion, Analogy, and Esse. International Philosophical Quarterly 46 (1):25-42.
Anthony Kenny (1980). Aquinas. Hill and Wang.
Anthony Kenny (1969). Aquinas. Garden City, N.Y.,Anchor Books.
Gyula Klima, Intentional Transfer in Averroes, Indifference of Nature in Avicenna, and the Issue of the Representationalism of Aquinas.
Anthony J. Lisska (2006). A Look at Inner Sense in Aquinas: A Long-Neglected Faculty Psychology. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 80:1-19.
Allan Bäck (1982). Aquinas on the Incarnation. New Scholasticism 56 (2):127-145.
Anthony Kenny (1976). Aquinas: A Collection of Critical Essays. University of Notre Dame Press.
Joseph W. Koterski (2004). The Doctrine of Participation in Aquinas's Commentary on St. John. In Jeremiah Hackett, William E. Murnion & Carl N. Still (eds.), Being and Thought in Aquinas. Global Academic Pub.
Norman Kretzmann & Eleonore Stump (eds.) (1993). The Cambridge Companion to Aquinas. Cambridge University Press.
Anthony J. Lisska (2006). A Look at Inner Sense in Aquinas. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 80:1-19.
Antonio Donato (2003). The Role of Focus in Aquinas's Doctrine of Analogy. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:289-301.
Added to index2011-12-01
Total downloads19 ( #206,525 of 1,934,670 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #434,272 of 1,934,670 )
How can I increase my downloads?